Short answer
In the Qur'an, Jesus is the Messiah, a prophet sent to Israel, neither a sorcerer nor God (3:45, 3:49, 5:75). In uncensored copies of the Babylonian Talmud, a Yeshu practised sorcery and led Israel astray (Sanhedrin 107b). Another passage says he was hanged on the eve of Passover (Sanhedrin 43a). The Qur'an says "they killed him not, nor crucified him" (4:157). A third passage says his punishment after death is boiling excrement (Gittin 57a). Most scholars read these Yeshu passages as being about Jesus. The Church worships him as God the Son. Maimonides, a 12th-century Jewish scholar, wrote that Jesus only imagined he would be the Messiah. He wrote that Jesus led most of the world to serve a god besides the LORD. Islam rejects both the charge of sorcery and the worship of Jesus.
Full explanation
The Talmud's stories: a sorcerer, hanged and punished
The Talmud is the collection of the early rabbis' teaching and debate. Its passages are named by book and page, such as Sanhedrin 107b. The Babylonian Talmud, edited about 500-600 CE, has a few short stories about a man called Yeshu. In Sanhedrin 107b a teacher of about 100 BCE pushes his pupil away. The pupil bows to a brick, and a closing saying charges that he practised sorcery and led Israel astray. In Sanhedrin 43a a baraita, an early teaching quoted in the Talmud, says Yeshu was hanged on the eve of Passover. A herald, it says, had called for forty days for anyone to defend him. In Gittin 57a, Onkelos, a nephew of the Roman Titus, is thinking of becoming a Jew. He calls up three dead men. The third, Yeshu, says his punishment is boiling excrement, and the Talmud gives the reason: he mocked the words of the sages.
Aggadah. A baraita (tanu rabbanan) teaches: always let the left hand push away and the right hand draw near, not like Elisha, who pushed Gehazi away with both hands, and not like Yehoshua ben Perachiah, who pushed Yeshu ha-Notzri away with both hands. The story follows. When King Yannai was killing the Sages, Yehoshua ben Perachiah and Yeshu went to Alexandria. On the way back the teacher praised an inn; the pupil said the innkeeper's eyes were narrow (terutot); the teacher excommunicated him with four hundred shofars. Later, while reciting the Shema, the teacher waved to him to wait; the pupil thought he was rejected, "went, set up a brick and bowed down to it" (azal zakaf leventa ve-hishtachaveh lah), and refused to repent, citing his teacher's rule that one who sins and makes the many sin is given no chance to repent. It closes: "And the Master said: Yeshu practised sorcery, enticed and led Israel astray" (kishef ve-hesit ve-hiddiach et Yisra'el). Printed editions from Basel (1578-81) on removed the name. The Jerusalem Talmud's older form of the story is at Hagigah 2:2.
The Mishnah (6:1) says a herald goes out before a man led to execution. The Talmud asks whether a herald also went out earlier, and quotes a baraita (tanya, a teaching presented as from the early sages, the tannaim, but left out of the Mishnah) as an objection. The baraita says that on the eve of Passover they hung Yeshu ha-Notzri. For forty days a herald had announced that he would be stoned, because he practised sorcery (kishef), enticed Israel to idolatry (hesit) and led it astray (hiddiach), and had called for anyone who knew a reason to acquit him. None was found. Ulla, a Palestinian-born teacher of the 3rd-4th century active in Babylonia, objects: an enticer to idolatry is not given a search for a defence (Deuteronomy 13:9). He answers himself: Yeshu was different, because he was karov le-malchut, close to the government (or to royalty). A second baraita follows on five disciples, each condemned by a play on a verse. It has no parallel in the Mishnah, the Tosefta or the Jerusalem Talmud. (A related tradition about Ben Stada, an enticer stoned at Lod, is in the Jerusalem Talmud, Sanhedrin 7:12, and Sanhedrin 67a adds that he was hanged on Passover eve; whether he is Jesus is disputed.) Manuscripts: MS Florence II.I.7-9 (1177), MS Karlsruhe (Reuchlin) 2 and MS Yad Harav Herzog 1 read Yeshu ha-Notzri, and Florence adds "on the eve of the Sabbath"; in MS Munich 95 (1342) the name has been erased (reported by Schäfer 2007, pp. 64-65 and 133-140, and for Florence and Munich by Rabbinovicz through Dalman 1893). The passage is missing from the standard printed (Vilna) text; the Koren/Steinsaltz edition restores it.
An anonymous aggadah (story) in the Talmud's cycle on the destruction of Jerusalem (Kamtza and Bar Kamtza, 55b-58a). Onkelos son of Kalonikos, son of Titus's sister, wants to convert (le-igayyurei). He raises by necromancy (be-negida) three dead men and asks each who is esteemed (chashiv) in that world, and whether he should join them. Titus says Israel's commandments are too many, and advises him to fight them; he is burned and scattered each day, as he decreed for himself. Balaam answers with Deuteronomy 23:7, "you shall not seek their peace or their welfare"; his punishment is boiling semen (be-shikhvat zera rotachat). The third says: seek their good, do not seek their harm (tovatam derosh, ra'atam lo tidrosh); whoever touches them touches the apple of his eye. His punishment is boiling excrement (be-tso'ah rotachat). The Talmud explains it with "as the Master said: whoever mocks the words of the Sages (ha-mal'ig al divrei chakhamim) is punished in boiling excrement". It closes: come and see the difference between the sinners of Israel (posh'ei Yisrael) and the prophets of the nations; the Vilna text adds ovdei avodah zarah, idol-worshippers. Rashi names the rule's source as Eruvin 21b. The Koren/Steinsaltz edition explains the closing line: Balaam, a prophet, wished Israel harm, while Yeshu ha-Notzri, a Jewish sinner, sought their good. Herford (p. 68) and Krauss called the three men Israel's chief enemies; the Talmud's own words do not. The name: the standard printed text reads "the sinners of Israel" in the third scene, though the verb is singular (asqeih, "raised him") and Onkelos asks about "that man". Three medieval manuscripts, read on the libraries' images, name him. MS Vatican ebr. 130 (1381), f. 35v, reads Yeshu ha-Notzri, "Jesus the Nazarene". MS Munich 95 (1342), f. 223r, and MS Vatican ebr. 140 (14th century), f. 54r, read Yeshu; the Rashi column of Vatican 140 glosses "the sinners of Israel" as "Yeshu". The Koren/Steinsaltz edition prints Yeshu ha-Notzri.
Who the name Yeshu means
The name Yeshu, or Yeshu the Nazarene, is in medieval manuscripts. Printed editions dropped the name or the passage, some even before the Basel edition of 1578-81, which was printed under Church censorship. Most modern scholars, among them R. Travers Herford (1903) and Peter Schäfer (2007), read these passages as about Jesus, as the rabbis imagined him. Each story has its own page on this site.
Herford notes that the censored modern editions read "the sinners of Israel", a plural that does not fit the singular story; the older editions read "the sinner of Israel", and the book of expurgated passages reads Yeshu. He concludes that Jesus is the person meant. On Sanhedrin 107b he notes that King Yannai reigned a full century before Jesus, and explains the anachronism by the rabbis' very vague ideas of past chronology. He judges that the story of Jesus in hell is a haggadic invention, not tradition about him, and that the rabbinic passages add nothing new to the Gospels' history of Jesus, beyond confirming that he lived.
Reads the Babylonian Talmud's Jesus passages as deliberate counter-narratives that parody the New Testament stories, written by rabbis who knew the Gospels, especially Matthew and John. He argues that this bold reply came from Sasanian Babylonia, where the rabbis lived outside Christian power, unlike the Jews of Roman and Byzantine Palestine. In his table of manuscripts and printings, all three manuscripts of Gittin 57a name Jesus, while the Soncino printing (1484-1519) leaves the name out and the Vilna edition reads "sinners of Israel"; he ascribes such gaps in the printed Jesus passages to censorship, or to printers pre-empting it. On Gittin 57a he doubts that mocking the Sages was the story's original charge, holding that the editor borrowed it from Eruvin 21b. He then offers, as an admittedly speculative reading, that the excrement mocks the Eucharist: Jesus sits in what his followers produce after eating his flesh.
The charge against his mother
Some texts also accused his mother. About 175-180 CE the pagan writer Celsus, in a book against Christians, has a Jew say that she bore Jesus to a soldier named Panthera. The Tosefta, a collection of early rabbinic teaching from about the third century, speaks of healing "in the name of Yeshua ben Pantera". It says nothing of his mother. A passage in the Babylonian Talmud says that a Miriam "strayed from her husband". It does not name Jesus; one manuscript adds his name. The Qur'an calls the charge against Mary "a grave false charge" (4:156). The page on who accused Mary of adultery gives the texts.
“But let us now return to where the Jew is introduced, speaking of the mother of Jesus, and saying that "when she was pregnant she was turned out of doors by the carpenter to whom she had been betrothed, as having been guilty of adultery, and that she bore a child to a certain soldier named Panthera;"”
Halakha with two stories (ma'aseh). The rule just before (2:21) forbids dealing with minim, sectarians, and being healed by them. 2:22-23: Rabbi Eleazar ben Dama was bitten by a snake. Jacob of Kefar Sama came to heal him "in the name of Yeshua ben Pantera" (mi-shum Yeshua ben Pantera). Rabbi Ishmael would not allow it, and Ben Dama died before he could bring his proof that it was permitted. Rabbi Ishmael praised him for not breaking "the fence of the Sages" (Ecclesiastes 10:8). 2:24: Rabbi Eliezer, arrested on a charge of minut (heresy) and released, tells Rabbi Akiva that in the street of Sepphoris Jacob of Kefar Sikhnin told him a word of minut "in the name of Yeshua ben Pantera", and it pleased him. Nothing is said here about Jesus' mother; the Tosefta gives only the name. The spelling of the second name varies between editions: Pantera in the vocalised text on Wikisource; Herford, translating Zuckermandel's edition, gives Pandira at 2:22 and Pantiri at 2:24.
“That they rejected Faith; that they uttered against Mary a grave false charge;”
Maimonides on Jesus and the Messiah
Moses Maimonides (1138-1204) wrote a medieval code of Jewish law, the Mishneh Torah. Near its end, in the Laws of Kings and Wars (11:4, uncensored), he writes of the King Messiah. The Messiah, he says, is a king of David's line who keeps the Torah, rebuilds the Temple and gathers Israel's exiles. One who fails, or is killed, is not the Messiah the Torah promised. Then Maimonides turns to Jesus the Nazarene, who "imagined he would be the Messiah" and "was killed by the court". He applies Daniel 11:14 to him: "they shall stumble". He blames Jesus for Israel slain by the sword, scattered and humbled, and for the Torah changed. Most of the world, he says, was led to serve a god besides the LORD. Yet all the matters of Jesus, and of "this Ishmaelite who arose after him", only prepare the way for the King Messiah. By "this Ishmaelite" he means the Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ). Through them, he says, talk of the Messiah, the Torah and the commandments has spread to far islands and many peoples. When the true Messiah comes, the nations will know that "their prophets and fathers misled them". Later printed editions cut these lines under Christian censorship, and the public-domain English of 1863 follows the censored text. This page follows the uncensored Hebrew. His other words on Islam, including his ruling that Muslims are not idolaters, are on the page on Maimonides and Islam.
Halakha 4 in the uncensored text. A king of David's line who studies the Torah and keeps the commandments, compels Israel to walk in them and fights the wars of the LORD is presumed to be the Messiah. If he succeeds, rebuilds the Temple in its place and gathers Israel's exiles, he is surely the Messiah; the texts printed by Mechon Mamre and Sefaria's Wikisource add that he defeats all the nations around him. If he does not succeed, or is killed, he is surely not the one the Torah promised: he is like the worthy kings of David's line who died, and God raised him only to test the many (Daniel 11:35). Then Maimonides writes of Yeshua ha-Notzri (Jesus the Nazarene), who imagined he would be the Messiah and was killed by the court (nehrag be-veit din). He applies Daniel 11:14 to him. The prophets, he says, foretold a Messiah who would save Israel, gather its exiles and strengthen its commandments; Jesus caused Israel to be destroyed by the sword and scattered, caused the Torah to be changed (le-hachalif ha-Torah), and led most of the world to worship a god besides the LORD. Then he says that all the matters of Jesus the Nazarene and of the Ishmaelite who came after him serve only to prepare the way for the King Messiah, and to set the whole world right to serve the LORD together, citing Zephaniah 3:9. Through them the world has been filled with talk of the Messiah, the Torah and the commandments, spread to far islands and many peoples. Those peoples debate the commandments. Some say they were true but have lapsed in this age and were not meant for all generations; others say they hold hidden meanings, not their plain sense, and that the Messiah has already come and revealed them. When the true Messiah comes, those peoples will know that their fathers inherited falsehood and that their prophets and fathers misled them. Printed editions were censored. On Sefaria (Torat Emet Hebrew) the failed claimant is 11:5 and the lines on Jesus and the Ishmaelite are 11:6-9; Sefaria's layer of censorship omissions reinserted marks 11:5-9 as cut. Soloweyczik's English of 1863 keeps 11:5 but not the names, the court, the changed Torah, the other god or the misled prophets.
“And in those times there shall many stand up against the king of the south; also the children of the violent among thy people shall lift themselves up to establish the vision; but they shall stumble.”
Soloweyczik's English of the Mishneh Torah (London, 1863), the public-domain English on Sefaria, follows a censored text of Kings and Wars 11. It names neither Jesus nor the Ishmaelite: it speaks only of one who pretended to be the Messiah, and of one who succeeded him. It leaves out that he was killed by the court, that he caused the Torah to be changed, and that he led most of the world to serve a god besides the LORD. At the end it says only that the nations will admit their claim was wrong, in place of the uncensored "their prophets and fathers misled them".
The Church's verdict: God the Son
The Church's creeds confess Jesus as God the Son. The Council of Nicaea, a gathering of bishops in 325, called him "true God of true God", of one substance with the Father. The Council of Chalcedon (451) confessed him one Christ in two natures, divine and human. Christians read John's Gospel this way: "the Word was God", and "the Word was made flesh". Thomas calls the risen Jesus "My Lord and my God". For Christians he is also the Messiah whom the prophets foretold, crucified and risen. To Christians, the Talmud's charges against him are false.
The creed opens: "We believe in one God, the Father Almighty, maker of all things visible and invisible". The council confessed the Son as begotten of the Father, true God of true God, and "of one substance" (homoousios) with the Father, and condemned those who said there was a time when he was not.
The council confessed one and the same Christ in two natures, divine and human, and declared him "not parted or divided into two persons, but one and the same Son".
“In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.”
“And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, (and we beheld his glory, the glory as of the only begotten of the Father,) full of grace and truth.”
“And Thomas answered and said unto him, My Lord and my God.”
The Qur'an's verdict: the Messiah, neither sorcerer nor God (﷾)
The Qur'an names him al-Masih, the Messiah. The angels tell Mary: "his name will be Christ Jesus, the son of Mary, held in honour in this world and the Hereafter" (3:45). He was "a messenger to the Children of Israel", and his signs came "by Allah's leave" (3:49). He came "to attest the Law which was before me", and to make lawful part of what had been forbidden (3:50). Against the charge of sorcery, the Qur'an says each sign came "by My leave", and that "the unbelievers among them" called it magic (5:110). Against the charge about his mother, it calls it "a grave false charge" (4:156). Against the claim that he was killed, it says "they killed him not, nor crucified him", and that God (﷾) raised him to Himself (4:157-158). Against his worship, it says he was "no more than a messenger" (5:75), who told Israel: "worship Allah, my Lord and your Lord" (5:72). The Qur'an answers Maimonides' charge against the Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ). The Qur'an came "confirming the scripture that came before it, and guarding it in safety" (5:48). The Arabic word, muhaymin, makes it the guardian and judge over the earlier books. Jesus himself gave "Glad Tidings of a Messenger to come after me" (61:6). Islam blames no one living today for words others wrote: "no bearer of burdens can bear the burden of another" (6:164).
“Behold! the angels said: "O Mary! Allah giveth thee glad tidings of a Word from Him: his name will be Christ Jesus, the son of Mary, held in honour in this world and the Hereafter and of (the company of) those nearest to Allah;”
“"And (appoint him) a messenger to the Children of Israel, (with this message): "'I have come to you, with a Sign from your Lord, in that I make for you out of clay, as it were, the figure of a bird, and breathe into it, and it becomes a bird by Allah's leave: And I heal those born blind, and the lepers, and I quicken the dead, by Allah's leave; and I declare to you what ye eat, and what ye store in your houses. Surely therein is a Sign for you if ye did believe;”
“"'(I have come to you), to attest the Law which was before me. And to make lawful to you part of what was (Before) forbidden to you; I have come to you with a Sign from your Lord. So fear Allah, and obey me.”
“Then will Allah say: "O Jesus the son of Mary! Recount My favour to thee and to thy mother. Behold! I strengthened thee with the holy spirit, so that thou didst speak to the people in childhood and in maturity. Behold! I taught thee the Book and Wisdom, the Law and the Gospel and behold! thou makest out of clay, as it were, the figure of a bird, by My leave, and thou breathest into it and it becometh a bird by My leave, and thou healest those born blind, and the lepers, by My leave. And behold! thou bringest forth the dead by My leave. And behold! I did restrain the Children of Israel from (violence to) thee when thou didst show them the clear Signs, and the unbelievers among them said: 'This is nothing but evident magic.'”
“That they rejected Faith; that they uttered against Mary a grave false charge;”
“That they said (in boast), "We killed Christ Jesus the son of Mary, the Messenger of Allah";- but they killed him not, nor crucified him, but so it was made to appear to them, and those who differ therein are full of doubts, with no (certain) knowledge, but only conjecture to follow, for of a surety they killed him not:-”
“Nay, Allah raised him up unto Himself; and Allah is Exalted in Power, Wise;-”
“Christ the son of Mary was no more than a messenger; many were the messengers that passed away before him. His mother was a woman of truth. They had both to eat their (daily) food. See how Allah doth make His signs clear to them; yet see in what ways they are deluded away from the truth!”
“They do blaspheme who say: "Allah is Christ the son of Mary." But said Christ: "O Children of Israel! worship Allah, my Lord and your Lord." Whoever joins other gods with Allah,- Allah will forbid him the garden, and the Fire will be his abode. There will for the wrong-doers be no one to help.”
“To thee We sent the Scripture in truth, confirming the scripture that came before it, and guarding it in safety: so judge between them by what Allah hath revealed, and follow not their vain desires, diverging from the Truth that hath come to thee. To each among you have we prescribed a law and an open way. If Allah had so willed, He would have made you a single people, but (His plan is) to test you in what He hath given you: so strive as in a race in all virtues. The goal of you all is to Allah; it is He that will show you the truth of the matters in which ye dispute;”
Explains muhaymin ("guarding it in safety") from the early authorities. In one report from Ibn Abbas, the Qur'an is trustworthy over every book before it. In another it is a witness over them, and in a third a judge over them. He reports Ibn Jurayj: whatever in the earlier books agrees with the Qur'an is true, and whatever differs from it is false. Ibn Kathir says the word includes all these meanings. He adds that God made the Qur'an, the last of the books, trustee, witness and judge over them all. God undertook to guard it Himself (15:9).
“And remember, Jesus, the son of Mary, said: "O Children of Israel! I am the messenger of Allah (sent) to you, confirming the Law (which came) before me, and giving Glad Tidings of a Messenger to come after me, whose name shall be Ahmad." But when he came to them with Clear Signs, they said, "this is evident sorcery!"”
“Say: "Shall I seek for (my) Cherisher other than Allah, when He is the Cherisher of all things (that exist)? Every soul draws the meed of its acts on none but itself: no bearer of burdens can bear the burden of another. Your goal in the end is towards Allah: He will tell you the truth of the things wherein ye disputed."”
Replies a Jewish or Christian reader makes, and the answers
Qur'an 4:157 — Surat al-Nisa (The Women), verse 157
“That they said (in boast), "We killed Christ Jesus the son of Mary, the Messenger of Allah";- but they killed him not, nor crucified him, but so it was made to appear to them, and those who differ therein are full of doubts, with no (certain) knowledge, but only conjecture to follow, for of a surety they killed him not:-”
Cited for
The Talmud, Maimonides and the Gospels all say Jesus died. The Qur'an alone denies it, six centuries later.
The response
Those accounts do not agree. The Talmud's story disagrees with the Gospels on the court, the method, the charge and the length of the trial. Nor are they three witnesses. Maimonides read the Talmud, and Schäfer argues that the Talmud's tellers knew the Gospels, especially John's. The Qur'an does not deny that people believed he died: "so it was made to appear to them". In its account, those who reported his death reported what they believed they saw. It adds that "those who differ therein are full of doubts". The pages on what the Talmud says about Jesus' death, and on whether he died on the cross, set the accounts side by side.
Where it lands — The human accounts of his death disagree with one another, as the verse says. The Qur'an, God's (﷾) word, gives the true account.
John 20:28 — Gospel of John, chapter 20, verse 28
“And Thomas answered and said unto him, My Lord and my God.”
Cited for
Jesus must be either what the Talmud says, a deceiver, or what the Church confesses, God. A good prophet is not an option for a man who made his claims.
The response
That argument assumes he claimed to be God. In Mark, the earliest Gospel, he names the Shema as the first of all the commandments. To a man who calls him good, he answers "there is none good but one, that is, God". The Qur'an gives the answer the argument leaves out: "Christ the son of Mary was no more than a messenger" (5:75). Mark also has him forgive sins, and his critics ask: "who can forgive sins but God only?" But Nathan told David, "The Lord also hath put away thy sin" (2 Samuel 12:13), and no one calls Nathan God (﷾). Matthew's telling of the same scene ends with the crowds glorifying God (﷾), "which had given such power unto men" (Matthew 9:8). In the chapter where Thomas speaks, Jesus calls the Father "my God, and your God" (John 20:17). The pages asking whether Jesus said he was God, and on Thomas's words, take each verse.
Where it lands — Between deceiver and God (﷾) there is a third answer: a prophet sent by God (﷾). The earliest Gospel shows it and the Qur'an says it.
Perspectives
Jewish (Maimonides and the rabbinic tradition)
Jesus was not the Messiah. The Messiah is a king of David's line who restores the Temple and gathers Israel's exiles, and Jesus did none of this. The Torah stands for ever, and no prophet may change a commandment. The worship of Jesus is service of a god besides the LORD.
The Messiah is a king of David's line who rebuilds the Temple and gathers the exiles. One who fails is not the Messiah the Torah promised.
Rebuttal
Islam does not claim that Jesus is the king Maimonides describes, who rebuilds the Temple. The Qur'an gives al-Masih as God's (﷾) own name for him (3:45). The Tanakh, the Hebrew Bible, gives mashiach, "anointed", to a priest and even to Cyrus, a Persian king.
A prophet may add or remove a commandment, or say the commandments were only for a time. Such a prophet is a false prophet.
Rebuttal
Deuteronomy 13:1 forbids men to change God's (﷾) law. God's (﷾) own law has differed between covenants: Jacob married two sisters (Genesis 29:28), which Leviticus 18:18 later forbids. In the Torah's own Hebrew, olam, "for ever", need not mean without end. The commentator Rashi reads a servant's "for ever" as until the Jubilee, the fiftieth year. The Torah tells Israel to hearken to a promised prophet who speaks God's (﷾) words.
Mainstream Christian
Jesus is the Messiah and God the Son, crucified and risen. The Talmud's charges against him are false.
The Creed of Nicaea confesses the Son as true God, of one substance with the Father.
Rebuttal
Jesus' own words in Mark, the earliest Gospel, point the other way. He names the Shema, "The Lord our God is one Lord", as the first commandment. He also says "there is none good but one, that is, God". The Ebionites, Jewish followers of Jesus who kept the Law, held no such creed.
John's Gospel says the Word was God and was made flesh. It has Thomas call Jesus "My Lord and my God".
Rebuttal
In the same Gospel Jesus calls the Father "the only true God", and himself the one "whom thou hast sent" (17:3). In the chapter where Thomas speaks, he calls the Father "my God, and your God" (20:17). The Qur'an calls him "a Word from Him" (3:45): a word God spoke, not God Himself.
Modern scholarship
Most scholars read the Babylonian Talmud's passages on Yeshu ha-Notzri (Yeshu the Nazarene) as about Jesus as the rabbis imagined him. Few give them any weight as history.
The Babylonian Jesus stories are replies to the Gospels' story, told outside Christian power.
Rebuttal
If so, these stories answer the Gospels; they are no separate witness to Jesus.
A minority holds that every identification with Jesus in the Talmud is late.
Rebuttal
Most scholars disagree, and the manuscripts name him. If the minority is right, the Talmud says nothing about Jesus at all.
Where the academy stands
Status: Majority view
Most modern scholars of these passages, such as Herford and Schäfer, hold that the Babylonian Talmud's passages on Yeshu ha-Notzri refer to Jesus of Nazareth. They show him as the rabbis imagined him. A minority, notably Johann Maier, argued the identification is late. Some texts speak of a Ben Stada or a Ben Pandira. Whether each of these meant Jesus is more disputed, and some medieval rabbis denied it. None of these scholars treats the stories as history.
The Islamic perspective
Jesus is al-Masih, the Messiah, a prophet and messenger sent to Israel. He confirmed the Torah and by God's (﷾) leave made some of its prohibitions lawful. His signs were not sorcery, his mother was not unchaste, he was not killed, and he is not God. No one bears the blame for words that others wrote.
The Qur'an names Jesus the Messiah and says he is honoured in this world and the Hereafter.
Jesus was a messenger to the Children of Israel, as Matthew's Gospel also has him say.
The Qur'an rejects the charge of sorcery and the charge against Mary.
Jesus was not killed or crucified; God (﷾) raised him to Himself.
Jesus was a servant of God (﷾), not God, and he disowns his worship.
Islam forbids blaming anyone for another's words.