Short answer
No. Muslims believe in the Torah God (﷾) gave to Moses and the Injil (the Gospel Jesus preached) that God (﷾) gave to Jesus. The books printed under those names today are not those revelations. The four New Testament Gospels are accounts about Jesus, written by men who do not name themselves. The Torah as printed tells of Moses' own death and burial. The Greek copies of the New Testament contain hundreds of thousands of differences. Most are small, but some change the meaning. The Bible's books also contradict each other in the Hebrew itself. Isaiah says the word of God (﷾) stands for ever. A book that errs cannot be that word, though much of the old revelation still shows through it. The Qur'an came to confirm what is true in it and to stand guard over it.
Full explanation
What a Muslim believes in
This is not an attack on the Torah or the Injil. The Qur'an says God (﷾) sent down the Torah to Moses and the Injil to Jesus, with guidance and light in them. A Muslim must believe in both. The Torah is the revelation as Moses received it. The Injil is the one message Jesus preached with his own mouth. The question is whether today's printed books are those revelations.
“It was We who revealed the law (to Moses): therein was guidance and light. By its standard have been judged the Jews, by the prophets who bowed (as in Islam) to Allah's will, by the rabbis and the doctors of law: for to them was entrusted the protection of Allah's book, and they were witnesses thereto: therefore fear not men, but fear me, and sell not my signs for a miserable price. If any do fail to judge by (the light of) what Allah hath revealed, they are (no better than) Unbelievers.”
“And in their footsteps We sent Jesus the son of Mary, confirming the Law that had come before him: We sent him the Gospel: therein was guidance and light, and confirmation of the Law that had come before him: a guidance and an admonition to those who fear Allah.”
“O ye who believe! Believe in Allah and His Messenger, and the scripture which He hath sent to His Messenger and the scripture which He sent to those before (him). Any who denieth Allah, His angels, His Books, His Messengers, and the Day of Judgment, hath gone far, far astray.”
No originals, and copies that differ
No original of any book of the Bible survives. More than 5,700 Greek manuscripts (hand-written copies) of the New Testament are known, and no two are exactly alike. Scholars estimate 200,000 to 400,000 or more differences among them. Most are small, but some change the meaning. The Hebrew Bible has the same problem. The Dead Sea Scrolls show several forms of the text in circulation. The Greek version of Jeremiah is about a seventh shorter than the Hebrew. Even evangelicals (conservative Protestant Christians) limit error-free scripture to originals that no one has.
Ehrman, who became a committed evangelical as a teenager and studied at Moody Bible Institute and Wheaton before his doctorate under Bruce Metzger at Princeton Theological Seminary, reports that more than 5,700 Greek manuscripts of the New Testament are known, besides about 10,000 in Latin. No two are exactly alike. Estimates of the differences among them run from 200,000 to 400,000 or more, so that there are more differences among the manuscripts than there are words in the New Testament. Most are immaterial slips such as spelling; some change the meaning of a passage. Most surviving copies are centuries later than the originals, and the earliest are few and mostly fragments.
The standard handbook on the text of the Hebrew Bible. The oldest complete Hebrew Bible that survives is the medieval Leningrad Codex (1008-1009 CE). The Scrolls show the scriptures circulating in several different text forms around the turn of the era. The Samaritan Pentateuch differs from the Jewish Masoretic text in about 6,000 places; the Greek Septuagint's Jeremiah is shorter than the Hebrew by about one-seventh and orders its chapters differently, and its Job is about a sixth shorter. The ages in the genealogies of Genesis 5 and 11 differ between the three texts, so their chronologies of the Flood and the creation differ by centuries.
The best-known evangelical statement on the Bible. It affirms that Scripture is without error in all it teaches, and that inspiration, strictly speaking, applies only to the original manuscripts (the autographs), which no longer exist. Copies and translations are the word of God only so far as they faithfully represent the original.
Whole passages in doubt
Some differences are whole passages. The King James Version prints words in 1 John 5:7 naming the Father, the Word and the Holy Ghost as one. Almost all modern Bibles have removed them, because no early Greek copy has them. The last twelve verses of Mark are missing from the two oldest Greek Bibles that survive, Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus.
“For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.”
“For there are three who testify:”
The English Revised Version (1881) and the American Standard Version (1901) removed the words about the Father, the Word and the Holy Ghost, and the RSV, NASB, NIV, NRSV and ESV print verse 7 without them, some with a footnote. The critical Greek editions used by translators today (Nestle-Aland and the United Bible Societies' text) leave them out.
“Now when Jesus was risen early the first day of the week, he appeared first to Mary Magdalene, out of whom he had cast seven devils.”
On Mark 16:9-20, reports that the last twelve verses are absent from the two oldest Greek Bibles that survive in large part, Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus, and from other early witnesses; that Eusebius and Jerome state the verses were missing from almost all the Greek copies known to them; that some manuscripts carry a different, shorter ending instead; and concludes that the Gospel as we have it from the earliest evidence ends at 16:8.
Books written by other hands
Deuteronomy, a book of Moses, tells of Moses' death and burial. It says no one knows his grave "unto this day". Genesis lists the kings of Edom "before there reigned any king over the children of Israel", which could only be written after Israel had kings. Numbers says "the man Moses was very meek, above all the men" on the earth. These are words written about Moses, not by him. The evangelical NIV Study Bible (a Bible with notes by conservative Protestant scholars) makes an admission. It says the last chapter of Deuteronomy was almost certainly written by someone else. It also says that parts of Numbers probably come from later scribes. Its introductions admit that Mark, Luke and John do not name their authors. The New Testament Gospels are four men's accounts about Jesus. Their very titles say "according to" Matthew or Mark.
“So Moses the servant of the Lord died there in the land of Moab, according to the word of the Lord. And he buried him in a valley in the land of Moab, over against Beth–peor: but no man knoweth of his sepulchre unto this day. And Moses was an hundred and twenty years old when he died: his eye was not dim, nor his natural force abated. And the children of Israel wept for Moses in the plains of Moab thirty days: so the days of weeping and mourning for Moses were ended. And Joshua the son of Nun was full of the spirit of wisdom; for Moses had laid his hands upon him: and the children of Israel hearkened unto him, and did as the Lord commanded Moses. And there arose not a prophet since in Israel like unto Moses, whom the Lord knew face to face,”
“And these are the kings that reigned in the land of Edom, before there reigned any king over the children of Israel.”
“(Now the man Moses was very meek, above all the men which were upon the face of the earth.)”
This evangelical study Bible holds that Moses was the main author of the five books, but its introductions grant later hands. On Genesis it says some later editorial updating appears to be indicated, pointing to the notes on 14:14 and 36:31. On Numbers it says the book need not have come from Moses complete and in final form, that portions were probably added by later scribes or editors, and that the praise of Moses' humility in 12:3 would hardly convince if it came from his own mouth. On Deuteronomy it says the report of Moses' death in chapter 34 was almost certainly written by someone else.
The evangelical NIV Study Bible's introductions hold to the traditional authors, but grant that the books themselves do not name them. On Mark: there is no direct evidence inside the book of who wrote it; the name rests on the testimony of the early church. On Luke: the name of the writer does not appear in the book (it adds that other evidence points to Luke). On John: the apostle is not named anywhere in the Gospel, and the notes argue for him from that silence.
Contradictions in the Hebrew itself
Samuel and Chronicles give different numbers for the same battle. Chronicles makes King Ahaziah older than his own father. The NIV and ESV print twenty-two instead, and say in a footnote that the Hebrew has forty-two. In the Hebrew of 2 Samuel, Elhanan kills Goliath. The King James translators supplied "the brother of", in italics, to make it agree with Chronicles. When translators must correct the text to make it agree with itself, the text they received was not free of error.
“And the Syrians fled before Israel; and David slew the men of seven hundred chariots of the Syrians, and forty thousand horsemen, and smote Shobach the captain of their host, who died there.”
“But the Syrians fled before Israel; and David slew of the Syrians seven thousand men which fought in chariots, and forty thousand footmen, and killed Shophach the captain of the host.”
“Forty and two years old was Ahaziah when he began to reign, and he reigned one year in Jerusalem. His mother’s name also was Athaliah the daughter of Omri.”
“Thirty and two years old was he when he began to reign, and he reigned in Jerusalem eight years, and departed without being desired. Howbeit they buried him in the city of David, but not in the sepulchres of the kings.”
“And there was again war with the Philistines at Gob; and Elhanan the son of Jaare-oregim the Beth-lehemite slew Goliath the Gittite, the staff of whose spear was like a weaver’s beam.”
“And there was again a battle in Gob with the Philistines, where Elhanan the son of Jaare–oregim, a Beth–lehemite, slew the brother of Goliath the Gittite, the staff of whose spear was like a weaver’s beam.”
Printed editions of the King James Version set the words "the brother of" in this verse in italic type. The King James translators used italics for words they supplied that are not in the Hebrew. The words are taken from 1 Chronicles 20:5.
“And there was war again with the Philistines; and Elhanan the son of Jair slew Lahmi the brother of Goliath the Gittite, whose spear staff was like a weaver’s beam.”
The Bible's own test
Isaiah says the word of our God (﷾) shall stand for ever. Paul, a Christian missionary of the first century, tells believers to test all things and hold on to what is good. Jeremiah had already warned that the false pen of the scribes had made the law a lie. So by the Bible's own standard, a text with whole passages in doubt, and with contradictions, cannot be the word that stands for ever.
“The grass withereth, the flower fadeth: but the word of our God shall stand for ever.”
“Prove all things; hold fast that which is good.”
““ ‘How do you say, “We are wise, and Yahweh’s law is with us?” But, behold, the false pen of the scribes has made that a lie.”
What Christians hold
Christians hold that the whole Bible is the word of God (﷾). Evangelicals define this carefully. The Bible is without error in its original manuscripts, and the copies we have are God's (﷾) word so far as they faithfully match those originals. They also point to Isaiah's promise that God's (﷾) word stands for ever. But no original survives, so on this view no reader today holds the error-free text.
The best-known evangelical statement on the Bible. It affirms that Scripture is without error in all it teaches, and that inspiration, strictly speaking, applies only to the original manuscripts (the autographs), which no longer exist. Copies and translations are the word of God only so far as they faithfully represent the original.
“The grass withereth, the flower fadeth: but the word of our God shall stand for ever.”
What the Qur'an says
The Qur'an says that some who received scripture moved words from their places, and forgot a good part of the message. It says some wrote the Book with their own hands, and then said it was from Allah (﷾). It calls itself a guardian over the earlier scripture. And it is the one book God (﷾) promised to guard. It sets the test the Bible fails: if it had come from anyone other than Allah (﷾), people would have found many contradictions in it. The Qur'an never depended on one first copy. Many knew it by heart. Zayd ibn Thabit wrote it down for the Prophet (ﷺ). And Gabriel went over it with him every year.
“But because of their breach of their covenant, We cursed them, and made their hearts grow hard; they change the words from their (right) places and forget a good part of the message that was sent them, nor wilt thou cease to find them- barring a few - ever bent on (new) deceits: but forgive them, and overlook (their misdeeds): for Allah loveth those who are kind.”
“Then woe to those who write the Book with their own hands, and then say:"This is from Allah," to traffic with it for miserable price!- Woe to them for what their hands do write, and for the gain they make thereby.”
“To thee We sent the Scripture in truth, confirming the scripture that came before it, and guarding it in safety: so judge between them by what Allah hath revealed, and follow not their vain desires, diverging from the Truth that hath come to thee. To each among you have we prescribed a law and an open way. If Allah had so willed, He would have made you a single people, but (His plan is) to test you in what He hath given you: so strive as in a race in all virtues. The goal of you all is to Allah; it is He that will show you the truth of the matters in which ye dispute;”
“We have, without doubt, sent down the Message; and We will assuredly guard it (from corruption).”
“Do they not consider the Qur'an (with care)? Had it been from other Than Allah, they would surely have found therein Much discrepancy.”
Zayd ibn Thabit reports that after many who knew the Qur'an by heart were killed at Yamama, Abu Bakr asked him to gather the Qur'an into one volume, reminding him that he used to write down the revelation for the Messenger of Allah. Zayd collected it from written pieces and from the memories of men, and the finished copy passed from Abu Bakr to Umar and then to Hafsa.
Abu Hurayra reports that Gabriel went over the Qur'an with the Prophet (ﷺ) once every year, and twice in the year he died.
Point by point
Misquoting Jesus (2005), on the number of variants
Ehrman, who became a committed evangelical as a teenager and studied at Moody Bible Institute and Wheaton before his doctorate under Bruce Metzger at Princeton Theological Seminary, reports that more than 5,700 Greek manuscripts of the New Testament are known, besides about 10,000 in Latin. No two are exactly alike. Estimates of the differences among them run from 200,000 to 400,000 or more, so that there are more differences among the manuscripts than there are words in the New Testament. Most are immaterial slips such as spelling; some change the meaning of a passage. Most surviving copies are centuries later than the originals, and the earliest are few and mostly fragments.
Cited for
Christians say most differences between manuscripts are spelling slips, and no Christian teaching depends on a disputed reading.
The response
Many are slips, but not all. Whole passages are at stake. One is the last twelve verses of Mark. Another is the words in 1 John 5:7, which were the only verse naming the Father, the Word and the Holy Ghost as one. When whole passages are in doubt, a reader cannot tell which words are God's (﷾).
Where it lands — The differences reach whole passages, including one that was printed for centuries as proof of the Trinity.
Chicago Statement on Biblical Inerrancy (1978)
The best-known evangelical statement on the Bible. It affirms that Scripture is without error in all it teaches, and that inspiration, strictly speaking, applies only to the original manuscripts (the autographs), which no longer exist. Copies and translations are the word of God only so far as they faithfully represent the original.
Cited for
Evangelicals say the Bible was without error in the originals, and the errors in today's copies came later.
The response
No one has the originals, so this cannot be checked. It also grants the point: the Bible in any reader's hands today is not the error-free text. That is what Muslims have said all along.
Where it lands — On the evangelical answer itself, the Bible we have is not the revelation as it was given.
Isaiah 40:8 — Nevi'im, Yeshayahu, chapter 40, verse 8
“The grass withereth, the flower fadeth: but the word of our God shall stand for ever.”
Cited for
Christians say God promised his word would stand for ever, so he must have kept the Bible intact.
The response
Then every error is a test of that promise. The Hebrew of 2 Chronicles 22:2 still makes Ahaziah older than his father, and 1 John 5:7 was printed as scripture for centuries. Either the promise failed, which no believer can say, or those words were never God's (﷾) word. The Bible as printed therefore mixes God's (﷾) word with men's. The one book God (﷾) promised to guard Himself is the Qur'an.
Where it lands — The promise holds for God's (﷾) word, and it is the Qur'an that has kept it.
Perspectives
Evangelical Christian
The Bible is the inspired word of God, and it is inerrant, which means free of error. Its first, original copies had no errors. And the copies we have keep them faithfully enough that no teaching is lost.
Scripture is without error in its first, original copies. Later copies and translations are God's word as far as they faithfully match them.
Rebuttal
On this view, the Bible in any reader's hands today is not the error-free text. Islam agrees with that. And the claim cannot be checked, because no original survives.
Isaiah promises that the word of God shall stand for ever.
Rebuttal
Islam agrees that God's (﷾) word stands for ever. But the Hebrew of 2 Chronicles 22:2 still makes Ahaziah older than his father, and 1 John 5:7 was printed as scripture for centuries. So not every printed word is God's (﷾) word. The one book God (﷾) promised to guard Himself is the Qur'an.
The Islamic perspective
The Torah and the Injil were true revelations, and a Muslim believes in them. The books printed under their names today are not those revelations as they were given. The Qur'an, revealed to the Prophet (ﷺ), confirms what is true in them and stands guard over them.
The Qur'an says God (﷾) revealed the Torah to Moses and the Injil to Jesus. There was guidance and light in them.
No original copy of any book of the Bible survives. And the copies that survive contain hundreds of thousands of differences between them.
Most modern Bibles have removed or marked off words that were printed as scripture for centuries. Examples are 1 John 5:7 and the end of Mark.
Deuteronomy tells of Moses' death. And evangelical study notes admit that later hands worked on the books of Moses, and that the writers of Mark, Luke and John do not name themselves.
The Hebrew text contradicts itself on numbers and ages, and translators have supplied words to reconcile it.
The Qur'an teaches that men changed the earlier scripture. And it says the Qur'an itself is a guardian over what came before.