Short answer
Islam says no, and the reasons can be checked in the Church's own publications. The Book of Mormon says it was written on gold plates between about 600 BC and AD 421. Joseph Smith said an angel took the plates back, so no one can examine them. The Church's own essay says he dictated it with a seer stone placed in a hat. DNA studies have not found its peoples, and in 2006 the Church changed its introduction. It has horses in America that, as far as science knows, were not there until the Spanish brought them. Its wording on God (﷾) was changed after the first printing. Joseph Smith also gave the Book of Abraham as scripture. Its papyri do not say what he said. Test the Qur'an the same way, and it holds.
Full explanation
What the book claims
Latter-day Saints believe the Book of Mormon "to be the word of God." Joseph Smith said an angel told him of "a book deposited, written upon gold plates, giving an account of the former inhabitants of this continent".
The book tells of a family that sailed from Jerusalem to America around 600 BC. Nations came from it. It ends with a prophet named Moroni around AD 421. It invites every reader to pray to know that it is true (Moroni 10:4).
Latter-day Saints believe the Bible to be "the word of God as far as it is translated correctly", and the Book of Mormon "to be the word of God."
The angel said there was "a book deposited, written upon gold plates, giving an account of the former inhabitants of this continent", holding "the fulness of the everlasting Gospel".
Readers are asked to "ask God, the Eternal Father, in the name of Christ, if these things are not true". To the sincere asker, "he will manifest the truth of it unto you, by the power of the Holy Ghost."
The original cannot be checked
Joseph Smith wrote that he received the plates on 22 September 1827. When he had finished, the angel "called for them, I delivered them up to him; and he has them in his charge until this day".
So no scholar, believer or critic can ever read the source. Every claim about the plates rests on the word of Joseph Smith and his witnesses. The Qur'an is different: its text, and pages from the time of its Prophet (ﷺ), can be examined today.
Joseph Smith received the plates on 22 September 1827. When his work was done, "the messenger called for them, I delivered them up to him; and he has them in his charge until this day" (2 May 1838).
Two parchment leaves carrying parts of Surahs 18 to 20 in early Hijazi script. In 2015 the Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit dated the parchment to between 568 and 645 CE, with 95.4 per cent probability, a span that covers the Prophet's (ﷺ) lifetime (c. 570-632). Apart from small points of spelling, the text on the leaves is the text of those surahs as the Qur'an has them today.
How it was dictated
The Church's own essay "Book of Mormon Translation" says Joseph Smith put "either the interpreters or the seer stone in a hat". He pressed his face into the hat and read the words aloud to a scribe. His wife Emma said the plates "often lay on the table ... wrapped in a small linen table cloth."
The same essay says that as a young man he had "used a seer stone to look for lost objects and buried treasure."
So the book did not come from reading the plates. It came from what Joseph Smith said he saw in the stone.
The essay says that, according to the accounts, Joseph Smith placed either the interpreters or the seer stone in a hat, pressed his face into the hat, and read the words aloud. It quotes Emma Smith that the plates "often lay on the table without any attempt at concealment, wrapped in a small linen table cloth." It also says that as a young man he "used a seer stone to look for lost objects and buried treasure."
- c. 600 BC
A family sails from Jerusalem
The story begins.
- AD 421
Moroni ends the record
The record is hidden away.
- 1827
Joseph Smith receives the plates
From an angel, he says.
- 1829
Dictated with a seer stone in a hat
The plates often lie wrapped on the table.
- 1830
First printed
Mary is "the mother of God".
- 1837
Words about God (﷾) changed
Now "the mother of the Son of God".
- 1838
Joseph Smith writes that the angel has the plates
No one can examine them.
- 2006
"Principal ancestors" becomes "among the ancestors"
The introduction is changed.
Ancient America: what has been found
The Book of Mormon says that when the family landed in America, they found "the ass and the horse" (1 Nephi 18:25). A 2023 study in Science says horses died out in North America by the end of the last Ice Age. As far as is known, they came back only with Europeans, and early American horses were mainly Spanish.
Its peoples have not been found either. The Church's essay on DNA says that "the majority of Native Americans carry largely Asian DNA." In 1981 the book's introduction called its people the "principal ancestors of the American Indians". In 2006 the Church changed this to "among the ancestors".
On reaching the promised land (dated in the chapter heading about 591-589 B.C.) the family found beasts of every kind, "both the cow and the ox, and the ass and the horse".
A genetic and archaeological study of early horses in the American West. The authors say that, as far as is known, horses died out in North America by the end of the Pleistocene (the last Ice Age) and were brought back by European colonists; the early American horses they studied were mainly of Spanish descent.
The essay says that "the majority of Native Americans carry largely Asian DNA." It notes that the introduction to the 1981 edition called the Lamanites the "principal ancestors of the American Indians", and that the 2006 introduction says instead that they are "among the ancestors". It suggests the Book of Mormon peoples may have been a small group among many.
The usual replies
Latter-day Saint writers reply that "horse" may name another animal. They say the book's peoples may have been a small group among many. The Church's essay on DNA takes the second view.
The essay says that "the majority of Native Americans carry largely Asian DNA." It notes that the introduction to the 1981 edition called the Lamanites the "principal ancestors of the American Indians", and that the 2006 introduction says instead that they are "among the ancestors". It suggests the Book of Mormon peoples may have been a small group among many.
Why the replies do not settle it
These replies change the book's plain words to fit what has been found. The book says "horse", and its own introduction said "principal ancestors" for 25 years. When a book's claims must be made smaller to survive, it has not passed the test of history.
The Qur'an's history can be checked too. It names the Romans' defeat and foretells their victory "within a few years" (30:2-4). That came true.
On reaching the promised land (dated in the chapter heading about 591-589 B.C.) the family found beasts of every kind, "both the cow and the ox, and the ass and the horse".
The essay says that "the majority of Native Americans carry largely Asian DNA." It notes that the introduction to the 1981 edition called the Lamanites the "principal ancestors of the American Indians", and that the 2006 introduction says instead that they are "among the ancestors". It suggests the Book of Mormon peoples may have been a small group among many.
“The Roman Empire has been defeated- In a land close by; but they, (even) after (this) defeat of theirs, will soon be victorious- Within a few years. With Allah is the Decision, in the past and in the Future: on that Day shall the Believers rejoice-”
Words about God (﷾) that were changed
The first edition of 1830 calls Mary "the mother of God, after the manner of the flesh". It calls Jesus "the Lamb of God, yea, even the Eternal Father!"
From the 1837 edition, these read "the mother of the Son of God" and "even the Son of the Eternal Father". The change matches Joseph Smith's later teaching that the Father and the Son are separate beings. A book that is God's (﷾) word should not need its words about God (﷾) corrected.
“Behold, the virgin which thou seest, is the mother of God, after the manner of the flesh. ... behold the Lamb of God, yea, even the Eternal Father!”
Mary is now "the mother of the Son of God", and Jesus "the Lamb of God, yea, even the Son of the Eternal Father!" The 1837 edition (Kirtland), pp. 31-32, already reads "the Son of" in both verses.
The Church teaches that the members of the Godhead are three separate beings, and that the Father and the Son have tangible bodies of flesh and bones.
The Book of Abraham: a test that can be checked
Joseph Smith also gave the Church the Book of Abraham, now in its scripture. He said it was translated from Egyptian papyri bought in Kirtland, Ohio, in 1835. Its heading still calls it Abraham's writing "by his own hand, upon papyrus." In 1967 ten of the papyrus fragments were given to the Church.
The Church's own essay says scholars identify them as "standard funerary texts". They date from "long after Abraham lived." The essay says Latter-day Saint and other Egyptologists "agree that the characters on the fragments do not match" his translation. None of them mentions Abraham.
In 1835 four mummies and several papyrus scrolls were bought in Kirtland, Ohio, the Church's headquarters. Ten fragments once owned by Joseph Smith were later held by the Metropolitan Museum of Art, which gave them to the Church in 1967. The essay says scholars identify them as "parts of standard funerary texts that were deposited with mummified bodies", dating "between the third century B.C.E. and the first century C.E., long after Abraham lived." It says that Latter-day Saint and other Egyptologists "agree that the characters on the fragments do not match" the translation, and that none of them mention Abraham's name. It suggests the papyri may have "catalyzed" a revelation.
The heading calls the book "A Translation of some ancient Records that have fallen into our hands from the catacombs of Egypt": "The writings of Abraham while he was in Egypt, called the Book of Abraham, written by his own hand, upon papyrus."
The Church's reply about the papyri
The essay suggests the papyri were an occasion for revelation, not a text translated word for word. It says they "catalyzed" a revelation about the life of Abraham.
In 1835 four mummies and several papyrus scrolls were bought in Kirtland, Ohio, the Church's headquarters. Ten fragments once owned by Joseph Smith were later held by the Metropolitan Museum of Art, which gave them to the Church in 1967. The essay says scholars identify them as "parts of standard funerary texts that were deposited with mummified bodies", dating "between the third century B.C.E. and the first century C.E., long after Abraham lived." It says that Latter-day Saint and other Egyptologists "agree that the characters on the fragments do not match" the translation, and that none of them mention Abraham's name. It suggests the papyri may have "catalyzed" a revelation.
Why that reply does not settle it
The book's own heading calls it the writings of Abraham, "written by his own hand, upon papyrus." If the papyri were only a prompt, the heading is wrong. Either way, the one source that could be checked does not say what Joseph Smith said.
The heading calls the book "A Translation of some ancient Records that have fallen into our hands from the catacombs of Egypt": "The writings of Abraham while he was in Egypt, called the Book of Abraham, written by his own hand, upon papyrus."
In 1835 four mummies and several papyrus scrolls were bought in Kirtland, Ohio, the Church's headquarters. Ten fragments once owned by Joseph Smith were later held by the Metropolitan Museum of Art, which gave them to the Church in 1967. The essay says scholars identify them as "parts of standard funerary texts that were deposited with mummified bodies", dating "between the third century B.C.E. and the first century C.E., long after Abraham lived." It says that Latter-day Saint and other Egyptologists "agree that the characters on the fragments do not match" the translation, and that none of them mention Abraham's name. It suggests the papyri may have "catalyzed" a revelation.
Test the Qur'an the same way
The Qur'an asks to be tested. "Had it been from other Than Allah, they would surely have found therein Much discrepancy" (4:82). It challenges anyone in doubt to "produce a Sura like thereunto" (2:23). And God (﷾) promised to guard it (15:9).
Its source was never taken away. It was recited in public, memorised by many, and written in its Prophet's (ﷺ) lifetime. Its oldest pages match it. Its history and its prophecies hold. Islam invites Latter-day Saints to give the Qur'an the test they would give any book.
“Do they not consider the Qur'an (with care)? Had it been from other Than Allah, they would surely have found therein Much discrepancy.”
“And if ye are in doubt as to what We have revealed from time to time to Our servant, then produce a Sura like thereunto; and call your witnesses or helpers (If there are any) besides Allah, if your (doubts) are true.”
“We have, without doubt, sent down the Message; and We will assuredly guard it (from corruption).”
Two parchment leaves carrying parts of Surahs 18 to 20 in early Hijazi script. In 2015 the Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit dated the parchment to between 568 and 645 CE, with 95.4 per cent probability, a span that covers the Prophet's (ﷺ) lifetime (c. 570-632). Apart from small points of spelling, the text on the leaves is the text of those surahs as the Qur'an has them today.
“The Roman Empire has been defeated- In a land close by; but they, (even) after (this) defeat of theirs, will soon be victorious- Within a few years. With Allah is the Decision, in the past and in the Future: on that Day shall the Believers rejoice-”
| Test | Book of Mormon | Qur'an |
|---|---|---|
| Can its source be examined? | No: the plates were taken back | Yes: recited, memorised, early pages |
| Were its words about God (﷾) changed? | Yes, from 1837 | No |
| Does its history hold? | Horses and peoples not found | The Romans' victory came true |
| A text that could be checked? | Book of Abraham papyri do not match | Its oldest pages match |
Perspectives
Latter-day Saint
The Book of Mormon is the word of God. It was translated by the power of God from ancient gold plates, and its truth is known by prayer.
The book was translated from gold plates that an angel showed Joseph Smith.
Rebuttal
The plates were taken back, and the Church's essay says the words came through a seer stone in a hat. No one can examine the source.
Its history is real: the book's peoples may simply have been a small group among many.
Rebuttal
The book's own introduction called them the principal ancestors of the American Indians until 2006. It also has horses in America that were not there.
The Islamic perspective
A book from God (﷾) can be tested: its source is kept, it does not contradict itself, its history holds and its words were not corrected. The Qur'an passes these tests.
A book from anyone other than God (﷾) would contain much discrepancy.
The Qur'an's oldest pages, dated to the Prophet's (ﷺ) lifetime, match its text today.