Short answer
No. Moksha is release from rebirth, but Hindu teachers disagree on what it is. For Shankara, no second one is left to enjoy anything. For Ramanuja, the soul stays itself and enjoys the Lord for ever. Madhva's school says freed souls rejoice in the Lord's presence, obedient to him for ever. Those last two are close in shape to Paradise. Many Hindus reply that Paradise is only a higher heaven that ends. The Gita does say such heavens end, when merit is used up. But Paradise is not wages that run out. The Qur'an promises it to those who believe and do right. It calls it "a gift without break", and they are never asked to leave. Its greatest joy is God's (﷾) good pleasure and the sight of Him.
Full explanation
Moksha: release from rebirth
Moksha means release. In Hindu teaching the soul passes from birth to birth, and moksha is the escape from that round. The Upanishads belong to the shruti, the scriptures Hindus hold to be revealed. The Chandogya Upanishad ends with a man who reaches the world of Brahman, the Supreme Being, "and does not return, yea, he does not return". The Bhagavad Gita belongs to the smriti, the remembered scriptures. It says that "after attaining to me, there is no birth again". A Hindu who asks this question means something serious. Why settle for a heaven, when you could be free of every world? The answer depends on what moksha is. Hindu teachers do not agree on that.
“He who has learnt the Veda from a family of teachers, according to the sacred rule, in the leisure time left from the duties to be performed for the Guru, who, after receiving his discharge, has settled in his own house, keeping up the memory of what he has learnt by repeating it regularly in some sacred spot, who has begotten virtuous sons, and concentrated all his senses on the Self, never giving pain to any creature, except at the tîrthas (sacrifices, &c.), he who behaves thus all his life, reaches the world of Brahman, and does not return, yea, he does not return.”
“The high-souled ones, who achieve the highest perfection, attaining to me, do not again come to life, which is transient, a home of woes. All worlds, O Arguna! up to the world of Brahman, are (destined) to return. But, O son of Kuntî! after attaining to me, there is no birth again.”
Shankara: no second one left
Shankara, a teacher of about the eighth century, taught Advaita (non-dualism). For him the true self is Brahman, and moksha is knowing this. He calls release "an eternally and essentially disembodied state", "free from all modifications". The Mundaka Upanishad says rivers vanish in the sea, "losing their name and their form", and that whoever knows Brahman "becomes even Brahman". In the Brihadaranyaka Upanishad the sage Yajnavalkya tells his wife Maitreyi that after departing "there is no more knowledge". She answers, "Here thou hast bewildered me, Sir". He explains that knowing needs two. When "the Self only is all this", he asks, "how should he know another?" Advaita does not call this nothingness. It says the Self is bliss itself, and the Taittiriya Upanishad says "bliss is Brahman". But it means that in the final state no second person is left to meet anyone or enjoy anything. So this moksha is not a better place than Paradise. It is not a place at all.
“All which passages establish the fact that so-called release differs from all the fruits of action, and is an eternally and essentially disembodied state. Among eternal things, some indeed may be 'eternal, although changing' (parinâminitya), viz. those, the idea of whose identity is not destroyed, although they may undergo changes; such, for instance, are earth and the other elements in the opinion of those who maintain the eternity of the world, or the three gunas in the opinion of the Sânkhyas. But this (moksha) is eternal in the true sense, i. e. eternal without undergoing any changes (kûtasthanitya), omnipresent as ether, free from all modifications, absolutely self-sufficient, not composed of parts, of self-luminous nature.”
“As the flowing rivers disappear in the sea, losing their name and their form, thus a wise man, freed from name and form, goes to the divine Person, who is greater than the great. He who knows that highest Brahman, becomes even Brahman. In his race no one is born ignorant of Brahman. He overcomes grief, he overcomes evil; free from the fetters of the heart, he becomes immortal.”
“Then Maitreyî said: 'Here thou hast bewildered me, Sir, when thou sayest that having departed, there is no more knowledge.' But Yâgñavalkya replied: 'O Maitreyî, I say nothing that is bewildering. This is enough, O beloved, for wisdom. 'For when there is as it were duality, then one sees the other, one smells the other, one hears the other, one salutes the other, one perceives the other, one knows the other; but when the Self only is all this, how should he smell another, how should he see another, how should he hear another, how should he salute another, how should he perceive another, how should he know another? How should he know Him by whom he knows all this? How, O beloved, should he know (himself), the Knower?'”
“He perceived that bliss is Brahman, for from bliss these beings are born; by bliss, when born, they live; into bliss they enter at their death.”
Ramanuja: the soul stays itself
Ramanuja, a teacher of the eleventh and twelfth centuries, read the same texts another way. For him the freed soul stays a soul, and its joy is the Lord. When the Lord is pleased by the worship of His devotees, He frees them. He lets them reach "that supreme bliss which consists in the direct intuition of His own true nature". After that He "does not turn them back". A fourteenth-century survey of the Hindu schools gives a verse for Ramanuja's system. The Lord gives His devotee "his own mansion, blissful, undecaying, from whence there is no more return". The scholar George Thibaut set the two teachers side by side. For Shankara, he wrote, release is "the absolute merging of the individual soul in Brahman". For Ramanuja it is passing "into a kind of heaven or paradise", to stay for ever "in undisturbed personal bliss". That matters, because this moksha is the same kind of hope as the one it is said to surpass.
“And with equal certainty we know from Scripture that this Supreme Lord, when pleased by the faithful worship of his Devotees—which worship consists in daily repeated meditation on Him, assisted by the performance of all the practices prescribed for each caste and âsrama—frees them from the influence of Nescience which consists of karman accumulated in the infinite progress of time and hence hard to overcome; allows them to attain to that supreme bliss which consists in the direct intuition of His own true nature: and after that does not turn them back into the miseries of Samsâra.”
“Vâsudeva, having found his votary, bestows upon him his own mansion, blissful, undecaying, from whence there is no more return.”
“The release from samsâra means, according to Sankara, the absolute merging of the individual soul in Brahman, due to the dismissal of the erroneous notion that the soul is distinct from Brahman; according to Râmânuga it only means the soul's passing from the troubles of earthly life into a kind of heaven or paradise where it will remain for ever in undisturbed personal bliss.”
Madhva: for ever different, and in grades
Madhva, a teacher of the thirteenth century, founded the school of Dvaita (dualism). For him the soul and the Lord stay different for ever. The same survey gives verses for his system. The freed soul "Rejoices in his presence for ever, enjoying painless bliss". Of the liberated it says, "Obedient to him are they for ever; he is the Lord." Release is "not won without the grace of Vishnu". Madhva adds that the released are not equal. His commentary speaks of "souls of lower grades", and says this causes no jealousy among them. So Madhva's end has a Lord, servants, ranks and a joy that lasts. Every one of these is also true of Paradise.
“Knowing Vishṇu, full of all excellences, the soul, exempted from transmigration, Rejoices in his presence for ever, enjoying painless bliss. Vishṇu is the refuge of liberated souls, and their supreme ruler. Obedient to him are they for ever; he is the Lord.”
“And emancipation is not won without the grace of Vishṇu, according to the text of the Náráyaṇa Upanishad: Through whose grace is the highest state, through whose essence he is liberated from transmigration, while inferior men propitiating the divinities are not emancipated; the supreme object of discernment to those who desire to be liberated from this snare of works.”
“From the absence of equality betwixt the released (in heaven) variance (jealousy, etc.,) does not arise between them; for all have attained to the direct knowledge of Brahman, and are free from defects or shortcomings, in which respect they are all equal; and there is the grace of the superiors to which the souls of lower grades are indebted.”
“And to all are (assigned) degrees according to the deeds which they (have done), and in order that (Allah) may recompense their deeds, and no injustice be done to them.”
“And We shall remove from their hearts any lurking sense of injury: (they will be) brothers (joyfully) facing each other on thrones (of dignity).”
One word, three different ends
Three great teachers read the same Upanishads and gave three different ends. In one there is no second to meet. In the other two the soul meets the Lord for ever. These cannot all be true, and the teachers said so. Ramanuja says a man told that release means "the loss of personal existence" "would turn away". He adds, "No sensible person exerts himself" for what remains "after he himself has perished". The Upanishad records the same worry. Indra is taught that the Self is dreamless sleep, and he objects: "He is gone to utter annihilation. I see no good in this." His teacher replies, "So it is indeed", and teaches him further. Even the ranking is disputed. The Bhagavata Purana names five kinds of release. It says the Lord's devotees do not accept any of them, even when offered, unless they may serve Him. So "moksha is better" says nothing until the speaker says which moksha. Whether the soul is God is answered on the page "Is the soul the same as God?". The Buddhist and Sikh forms of this question have their own pages: "Is nirvana better than Paradise?" and "Is mukti better than Paradise?".
“If, on the other hand, he were to realise that the effect of such activity would be the loss of personal existence, he surely would turn away as soon as somebody began to tell him about 'release.' And the result of this would be that, in the absence of willing and qualified pupils, the whole scriptural teaching as to final release would lose its authoritative character.—Nor must you maintain against this that even in the state of release there persists pure consciousness; for this by no means improves your case. No sensible person exerts himself under the influence of the idea that after he himself has perished there will remain some entity termed 'pure light!'”
“'When a man being asleep, reposing, and at perfect rest, sees no dreams, that is the Self, this is the immortal, the fearless, this is Brahman.' Then Indra went away satisfied in his heart. But before he had returned to the Devas, he saw this difficulty. In truth he thus does not know himself (his self) that he is I, nor does he know anything that exists. He is gone to utter annihilation. I see no good in this. Taking fuel in his hand he went again as a pupil to Pragâpati. Pragâpati said to him: 'Maghavat, as you went away satisfied in your heart, for what purpose did you come back?' He said: 'Sir, in that way he does not know himself (his self) that he is I, nor does he know anything that exists. He is gone to utter annihilation. I see no good in this.' 'So it is indeed, Maghavat,' replied Pragâpati; 'but I shall explain him (the true Self) further to you, and nothing more than this. Live here other five years.'”
The Lord, as the sage Kapila, says that His devotees do not accept any of five kinds of release, even when it is offered, without service to Him. The five are living in His world, sharing His powers, nearness to Him, a form like His, and oneness with Him.
| Point | Shankara | Ramanuja | Madhva |
|---|---|---|---|
| The freed soul | Knows it is Brahman; no second is left | Stays a soul | Stays different from the Lord for ever |
| Its joy | No second to meet or enjoy | The direct sight of the Lord's nature | Rejoices in the Lord's presence, in grades |
| How it comes | By knowledge; no deed produces it | The Lord, pleased by worship, frees the soul | By the grace of Vishnu |
| Is it a place? | No | The Lord's own mansion | In the Lord's presence |
"Paradise is only a higher heaven that ends"
Many Hindus reply that Paradise is Svarga, the heaven of the gods, under another name. The texts do say that such heavens end. The Gita says people who sacrifice for heaven enjoy its pleasures, and then "they enter the mortal world when (their) merit is exhausted". The Chandogya says they stay "till their (good) works are consumed". The Mundaka says that after enjoying their reward "they enter again this world or a lower one". The Gita goes further: "All worlds", up to the world of Brahman, "are (destined) to return". And the Mundaka gives a reason: "Nothing that is eternal (not made) can be gained by what is not eternal (made)." Good deeds are limited, so their reward must be limited. Ramanuja says the same of Indra's blessed state: it "lasts, besides, for a time only". So, a Hindu may say, Paradise is a long stay that ends in return.
“Those who know the three (branches of) knowledge, who drink the Soma juice, whose sins are washed away, offer sacrifices and pray to me for a passage into heaven; and reaching the holy world of the lord of gods, they enjoy in the celestial regions the celestial pleasures of the gods. And having enjoyed that great heavenly world, they enter the mortal world when (their) merit is exhausted. Thus those who wish for objects of desire, and resort to the ordinances of the three (Vedas), obtain (as the fruit) going and coming. To those men who worship me, meditating on me and on no one else, and who are constantly devoted, I give new gifts and preserve what is acquired by them.”
“'But they who living in a village practise (a life of) sacrifices, works of public utility, and alms, they go to the smoke, from smoke to night, from night to the dark half of the moon, from the dark half of the moon to the six months when the sun goes to the south. But they do not reach the year. 'From the months they go to the world of the fathers, from the world of the fathers to the ether, from the ether to the moon. That is Soma, the king. Here they are loved (eaten) by the Devas, yes, the Devas love (eat) them. 'Having dwelt there, till their (good) works are consumed, they return again that way as they came, to the ether, from the ether to the air. Then the sacrificer, having become air, becomes smoke, having become smoke, he becomes mist, 'Having become mist, he becomes a cloud, having become a cloud, he rains down. Then he is born as rice and corn, herbs and trees, sesamum and beans. From thence the escape is beset with most difficulties. For whoever the persons may be that eat the food, and beget offspring, he henceforth becomes like unto them.”
“Considering sacrifice and good works as the best, these fools know no higher good, and having enjoyed (their reward) on the height of heaven, gained by good works, they enter again this world or a lower one.”
“The high-souled ones, who achieve the highest perfection, attaining to me, do not again come to life, which is transient, a home of woes. All worlds, O Arguna! up to the world of Brahman, are (destined) to return. But, O son of Kuntî! after attaining to me, there is no birth again.”
“Let a Brâhmana, after he has examined all these worlds which are gained by works, acquire freedom from all desires. Nothing that is eternal (not made) can be gained by what is not eternal (made). Let him, in order to understand this, take fuel in his hand and approach a Guru who is learned and dwells entirely in Brahman.”
“The blessed state of Indra etc., is indeed restricted, and lasts, besides, for a time only. The worshippers achieve but that blessed state as is on a par with that of Indra etc., but when Indra and other deities reach the end of their happy state, they fall; with them do their worshippers necessarily also fall.”
Islam agrees: deeds cannot buy eternity
Every text above gives the same reason for a heaven ending: the merit runs out. Islam accepts that limited deeds cannot pay for what has no end. That is why Paradise is not this kind of heaven. The Prophet (ﷺ) said that no one's deeds will save him, not even his own, unless Allah (﷾) covers him with mercy. Yet deeds do count. The Qur'an tells the righteous, "enter ye the Garden, because of (the good) which ye did". Al-Nawawi, one of the best-known commentators on hadith, explains that the two do not conflict. Deeds are the cause of entering. But the help to do them, the guidance to do them sincerely and their acceptance all come from God's (﷾) mercy. So no one enters by deeds alone. The Qur'an gives the measure. Whoever does good "shall have ten times as much to his credit". Whoever does evil is repaid only "according to his evil". The reward is out of all proportion to the work, so it is not a wage. The Garden is promised to "those who believe and work righteous deeds", and the Qur'an calls it "a gift without break". A wage ends with the work that earned it. There is no store of merit here to be used up. Its people will not taste death there, they are never asked to leave, and they wish for no change. So the Mundaka's rule can stand, and it still does not touch a home given by mercy.
Abu Hurayra reports that the Prophet (ﷺ) said no one's deeds will save him. Asked whether that included him, he said: not even me, unless Allah covers me with His mercy. He then told them to do good deeds properly, sincerely and in moderation.
Abu Hurayra reports that the Prophet (ﷺ) said that no one of you will be saved by his deeds. A man asked: not even you, Messenger of Allah? He said: not even me, unless Allah covers me with mercy from Him; but keep to what is right. Muslim's second chain has "with mercy from Him and grace", without the last words. The chapter heading, added by a later editor, reads: no one enters Paradise by his deeds, but by the mercy of Allah.
“(Namely) those whose lives the angels take in a state of purity, saying (to them), "Peace be on you; enter ye the Garden, because of (the good) which ye did (in the world)."”
On the hadith that no one enters Paradise by his deeds, al-Nawawi sets beside it the verses that tell the believers to enter the Garden for what they used to do (16:32; 43:72). He says they do not conflict. The verses mean that Paradise is entered because of deeds. But being enabled to do the deeds, being guided to sincerity in them, and having them accepted are by the mercy and favour of God. So it is true that no one enters by deeds alone, which is what the hadith mean. It is also true that he enters by deeds, that is, because of them, and they are themselves part of the mercy.
“He that doeth good shall have ten times as much to his credit: He that doeth evil shall only be recompensed according to his evil: no wrong shall be done unto (any of) them.”
“And those who are blessed shall be in the Garden: They will dwell therein for all the time that the heavens and the earth endure, except as thy Lord willeth: a gift without break.”
“Nor will they there taste Death, except the first death; and He will preserve them from the Penalty of the Blazing Fire,-”
“There no sense of fatigue shall touch them, nor shall they (ever) be asked to leave.”
“As to those who believe and work righteous deeds, they have, for their entertainment, the Gardens of Paradise, Wherein they shall dwell (for aye): no change will they wish for from them.”
The Hindu texts say heavens end. Is that true of Paradise?
Why do those heavens end?
The merit that paid for them is used up.
Is Paradise paid for with merit?
No. No one's deeds save him without God's (﷾) mercy.
So what is it?
A gift without break.
No store of merit runs out, so that cause of ending is not there.
The Gita's own exception
The Gita does not say that every home ends. Straight after "All worlds" it says, "after attaining to me, there is no birth again". It speaks of what "is not destroyed when all entities are destroyed": "Attaining to it, none returns. That is my supreme abode." And the devotee gains "the imperishable and eternal seat" "through my favour". The last words of the Brahma Sutra are non-return, stated twice. So the rule is this: a world earned by merit ends, and nearness to the Lord by His favour does not. Ramanuja gives the reason. The freed soul's blessings "are permanent in so far as the Lord himself on whom they depend is permanent". That is also the Islamic answer. Ibn Kathir says the Garden's people do not stay by any necessity of their own. Their staying rests on God's (﷾) will, and He has promised it without break. By the Gita's own test, Paradise falls under the exception and not the rule. The Qur'an places the righteous "In an Assembly of Truth, in the Presence of a Sovereign Omnipotent". A Hindu will say the "me" of the Gita is Krishna. Then the dispute has moved. It is no longer whether a lasting home with the Lord can exist, but who the Lord is.
“The high-souled ones, who achieve the highest perfection, attaining to me, do not again come to life, which is transient, a home of woes. All worlds, O Arguna! up to the world of Brahman, are (destined) to return. But, O son of Kuntî! after attaining to me, there is no birth again.”
“But there is another entity, unperceived and eternal, and distinct from this unperceived (principle), which is not destroyed when all entities are destroyed. It is called the unperceived, the indestructible; they call it the highest goal. Attaining to it, none returns. That is my supreme abode.”
“By (that) devotion he truly understands who I am and how great. And then understanding me truly, he forthwith enters into my (essence). Even performing all actions, always depending on me, he, through my favour, obtains the imperishable and eternal seat.”
“(Of them) there is non-return, according to scripture; non-return, according to scripture.”
“The exalted qualities of the soul—freedom from evil and sin and so on—which manifest themselves in the state of Release no doubt belong to the soul's essential nature; but that the soul is of such a nature fundamentally depends on the Supreme Person, and on him also depends the permanency of those qualities; they are permanent in so far as the Lord himself on whom they depend is permanent.”
Explains "except as thy Lord willeth": the people of the Garden stay there for ever, but their staying in bliss is not something necessary in itself. It is left to the will of God, so the favour is always His. On "a gift without break" he says the gift is uncut, as Ibn Abbas, Mujahid and others said. The words come after the mention of God's will so that no one should imagine a break, and they seal the verse with lasting and no ending. He also gives the view of al-Dahhak and al-Hasan al-Basri that the exception concerns sinful believers who were in the Fire and were brought out.
“As to the Righteous, they will be in the midst of Gardens and Rivers, In an Assembly of Truth, in the Presence of a Sovereign Omnipotent.”
What begins does not have to end
A Hindu may press the point: whatever begins must end, and a stay in Paradise begins. But for Ramanuja and Madhva the soul's release also starts at a moment, and it never ends. The Lord frees His devotee, and "after that" does not send him back. Ramanuja says we need not fear that the Lord will turn back "the Devotee whom he greatly loves". They may say the soul's nature was always so, and only shows itself then. But the showing starts at a moment, and it is the joy that matters. So these two schools already hold a joy with a beginning and no end. Shankara avoids this by saying release is not produced at all, since the self always was Brahman. But that rests on the very claim Ramanuja and Madhva reject. So "what begins must end" cannot be used against Paradise without being used against their moksha too. The reply that Paradise must end does not speak for the Hindu tradition as a whole.
“And with equal certainty we know from Scripture that this Supreme Lord, when pleased by the faithful worship of his Devotees—which worship consists in daily repeated meditation on Him, assisted by the performance of all the practices prescribed for each caste and âsrama—frees them from the influence of Nescience which consists of karman accumulated in the infinite progress of time and hence hard to overcome; allows them to attain to that supreme bliss which consists in the direct intuition of His own true nature: and after that does not turn them back into the miseries of Samsâra.”
“Nor indeed need we fear that the Supreme Lord when once having taken to himself the Devotee whom he greatly loves will turn him back into the Samsâra.”
“Knowing Vishṇu, full of all excellences, the soul, exempted from transmigration, Rejoices in his presence for ever, enjoying painless bliss. Vishṇu is the refuge of liberated souls, and their supreme ruler. Obedient to him are they for ever; he is the Lord.”
“All which passages establish the fact that so-called release differs from all the fruits of action, and is an eternally and essentially disembodied state. Among eternal things, some indeed may be 'eternal, although changing' (parinâminitya), viz. those, the idea of whose identity is not destroyed, although they may undergo changes; such, for instance, are earth and the other elements in the opinion of those who maintain the eternity of the world, or the three gunas in the opinion of the Sânkhyas. But this (moksha) is eternal in the true sense, i. e. eternal without undergoing any changes (kûtasthanitya), omnipresent as ether, free from all modifications, absolutely self-sufficient, not composed of parts, of self-luminous nature.”
| End | Paid for by merit | Ends | A soul left to enjoy it | With the Lord |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Svarga, the heaven of the gods | ||||
| Moksha, Shankara | ||||
| Moksha, Ramanuja | ||||
| Moksha, Madhva | ||||
| Paradise |
- Yes
- No
- Not said
"Moksha is beyond desire, and Paradise feeds it"
Another reply concerns desire. The Gita warns of "flowery talk" from those "who are full of desires, and whose goal is heaven". The Mundaka tells the seeker to "acquire freedom from all desires". So, a Hindu may say, a Paradise of wishes granted is desire's last prize. Moksha lies beyond wanting.
“The state of mind consisting in firm understanding regarding steady contemplation does not belong to those, O son of Prithâ! who are strongly attached to (worldly) pleasures and power, and whose minds are drawn away by that flowery talk which is full of (ordinances of) specific acts for the attainment of (those) pleasures and (that) power, and which promises birth as the fruit of acts—(that flowery talk) which those unwise ones utter, who are enamoured of Vedic words, who say there is nothing else, who are full of desires, and whose goal is heaven.”
“Let a Brâhmana, after he has examined all these worlds which are gained by works, acquire freedom from all desires. Nothing that is eternal (not made) can be gained by what is not eternal (made). Let him, in order to understand this, take fuel in his hand and approach a Guru who is learned and dwells entirely in Brahman.”
The Upanishad gives the freed soul its wishes
The Upanishads do not end wishing. The Chandogya says the Self "desires nothing but what it ought to desire", and it speaks of "true desires". Of those who have found them it says, "by his mere will food and drink come to him". Of "whatever object he desires" it says, "by his mere will it comes to him, and having obtained it, he is happy". Later it says the one who has reached the highest light "moves about there laughing (or eating), playing, and rejoicing", with "women, carriages, or relatives". Ramanuja reads this as "Concerning the released soul", and the Brahma Sutra says wishes are met "by mere will". Shankara applies the lines on wishes to those who meditate on the qualified Brahman, the Lord with attributes. He says that in the end they too reach the final release, and "do not return". The Rig Veda prays for a home of this kind: "Make me immortal in that realm" where "longing wishes are fulfilled". So these texts draw a line between true and false desires. They do not condemn desire as such. The Qur'an draws that line too. It promises the Garden to everyone who turned to God (﷾) "in sincere repentance" and "brought a heart turned in devotion". They have "all that they wish", and hear no frivolity and no taint of ill. What the Gita warns against is worship done for rewards. And the greatest bliss of Paradise is not a reward in things. It is the good pleasure of Allah (﷾).
“Then he should say: 'By the old age of the body, that (the ether, or Brahman within it) does not age; by the death of the body, that (the ether, or Brahman within it) is not killed. That (the Brahman) is the true Brahma-city (not the body). In it all desires are contained. It is the Self, free from sin, free from old age, from death and grief, from hunger and thirst, which desires nothing but what it ought to desire, and imagines nothing but what it ought to imagine. Now as here on earth people follow as they are commanded, and depend on the object which they are attached to, be it a country or a piece of land, 'And as here on earth, whatever has been acquired by exertion, perishes, so perishes whatever is acquired for the next world by sacrifices and other good actions performed on earth. Those who depart from hence without having discovered the Self and those true desires, for them there is no freedom in all the worlds. But those who depart from hence, after having discovered the Self and those true desires, for them there is freedom in all the worlds.”
“And he who desires the world of food and drink, by his mere will food and drink come to him, and having obtained the world of food and drink, he is happy.”
“Whatever object he is attached to, whatever object he desires, by his mere will it comes to him, and having obtained it, he is happy.”
“Thus does that serene being, arising from this body, appear in its own form, as soon as it has approached the highest light (the knowledge of Self). He (in that state) is the highest person (uttama purusha). He moves about there laughing (or eating), playing, and rejoicing (in his mind), be it with women, carriages, or relatives, never minding that body into which he was born.”
“Concerning the released soul Scripture states, 'He moves about there, laughing, playing, rejoicing, be it with women, or chariots, or relatives' (Kh. Up. VIII, 12, 3).”
“But by mere will (the released effect their purposes); because scripture states that.”
“It is a settled matter that those who through perfect knowledge have dispelled all mental darkness and are devoted to the eternally perfect Nirvâna do not return. And as those also who rely on the knowledge of the qualified Brahman in the end have recourse to that (Nirvâna), it follows that they also do not return.”
“Make me immortal in that realm of eager wish and strong desire, The region of the radiant Moon, where food and full delight are found. Flow, Indu, flow for Indra's sake. Make me immortal in that realm where happiness and transports, where Joys and felicities combine, and longing wishes are fulfilled. Flow, Indu, flow for Indra's sake.”
“(A voice will say:) "This is what was promised for you,- for every one who turned (to Allah) in sincere repentance, who kept (His Law), "Who feared (Allah) Most Gracious Unseen, and brought a heart turned in devotion (to Him):”
“There will be for them therein all that they wish,- and more besides in Our Presence.”
“Not frivolity will they hear therein, nor any taint of ill,- Only the saying, "Peace! Peace".”
“Allah hath promised to Believers, men and women, gardens under which rivers flow, to dwell therein, and beautiful mansions in gardens of everlasting bliss. But the greatest bliss is the good pleasure of Allah: that is the supreme felicity.”
| Source | What it says |
|---|---|
| Chandogya Upanishad | Whatever he desires comes to him by his mere will, and he is happy |
| Brahma Sutra | The released gain their purposes by mere will |
| Rig Veda | A prayer to be made immortal in a realm where longing wishes are fulfilled |
| Qur'an | All that they wish, and more, for those who turned to God (﷾) in sincere repentance |
The summit: a servant who sees his Lord
The Qur'an promises gardens to "Believers, men and women". Then it says, "the greatest bliss is the good pleasure of Allah". On that Day some faces will beam, "Looking towards their Lord". The Prophet (ﷺ) told his Companions they would see their Lord as clearly as they saw the full moon. He then told them to let nothing make them miss the prayer before sunrise and the prayer before sunset. He said that when the people of Paradise have entered it, Allah (﷾) lifts the veil. Nothing they were given is dearer to them than looking at their Lord. God (﷾) says He has prepared for His righteous servants what no eye has seen and no heart has imagined. The page "What is Paradise like in Islam?" gives the rest of the Qur'an's picture. And the soul stays a soul. Even in Paradise its cry is "Glory to Thee, O Allah!". Every being comes to God (﷾) as a servant. Hindu teachers keep a form of this line too. Speaking of those who reach the Lord's world, Shankara says the "world-business" "can belong to the everlastingly perfect Lord only". The Qur'an makes that line plain and final. You will meet your Lord, and you will never become Him. That is why the meeting can be a joy: there is someone to meet, and someone left to be glad.
“Allah hath promised to Believers, men and women, gardens under which rivers flow, to dwell therein, and beautiful mansions in gardens of everlasting bliss. But the greatest bliss is the good pleasure of Allah: that is the supreme felicity.”
“Some faces, that Day, will beam (in brightness and beauty);- Looking towards their Lord;”
Jarir reports that the Prophet (ﷺ) looked at the full moon one night and said: you will see your Lord as you see this moon, with no difficulty in seeing Him; so, if you can, let nothing make you miss the prayer before sunrise and the prayer before sunset. Al-Bukhari places it in the chapter on the verses about faces that look towards their Lord (75:22-23).
Suhayb reports that the Prophet (ﷺ) said that when the people of Paradise have entered it, Allah asks whether they wish Him to give them anything more. They answer that He has already brightened their faces, admitted them to Paradise and saved them from the Fire. Then He lifts the veil, and nothing they have been given is dearer to them than looking at their Lord. Muslim places it in the chapter on affirming that the believers will see their Lord in the Hereafter.
Abu Hurayra reports that the Prophet (ﷺ) said God has declared: I have prepared for My righteous servants what no eye has seen, no ear has heard, and no human heart has imagined. The report then invites the listener to recite Qur'an 32:17: no soul knows what joy is kept hidden for them.
“(This will be) their cry therein: "Glory to Thee, O Allah!" And "Peace" will be their greeting therein! and the close of their cry will be: "Praise be to Allah, the Cherisher and Sustainer of the worlds!"”
“Not one of the beings in the heavens and the earth but must come to (Allah) Most Gracious as a servant.”
“With the exception of the origination and so on of the world all other lordly powers, as e. g. rendering one's self of atomic size, must belong to the released. The world-business, on the other hand, can belong to the everlastingly perfect Lord only.”
One life, and a plain promise
The Gita calls the Lord "easy of access" to the devotee who is "ever and constantly meditating" on Him. But it also says how few arrive. "Among thousands of men, only some work for perfection". Of those, "only some know me truly". It says the wise man comes "At the end of many lives", and that such a man "is very hard to find". Islam teaches one life, and the door is open now to every person. God (﷾) says He is close and answers the one who calls. He tells those who have wronged their own souls not to despair of His mercy, and to turn to Him in repentance. And the Qur'an names the end: "Come back thou to thy Lord, well pleased (thyself), and well-pleasing unto Him". So the question is not which end sounds higher. We cannot go and look at either one from here. The real question is who told the truth about them, and that can be tested in this life. The Qur'an asks to be considered with care, and God (﷾) sent Muhammad (ﷺ) to all mankind. Belief, worship and character belong together there, as one way of life.
“To the devotee who constantly practises abstraction, O son of Prithâ! and who with a mind not (turned) to anything else, is ever and constantly meditating on me, I am easy of access.”
“Among thousands of men, only some work for perfection; and even of those who have reached perfection, and who are assiduous, only some know me truly.”
“At the end of many lives, the man possessed of knowledge approaches me, (believing) that Vâsudeva is everything. Such a high-souled man is very hard to find.”
“When My servants ask thee concerning Me, I am indeed close (to them): I listen to the prayer of every suppliant when he calleth on Me: Let them also, with a will, Listen to My call, and believe in Me: That they may walk in the right way.”
“Say: "O my Servants who have transgressed against their souls! Despair not of the Mercy of Allah: for Allah forgives all sins: for He is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.”
“"Turn ye to our Lord (in repentance) and bow to His (Will), before the Penalty comes on you: after that ye shall not be helped.”
“(To the righteous soul will be said:) "O (thou) soul, in (complete) rest and satisfaction! "Come back thou to thy Lord,- well pleased (thyself), and well-pleasing unto Him! "Enter thou, then, among My devotees! "Yea, enter thou My Heaven!”
“Do they not consider the Qur'an (with care)? Had it been from other Than Allah, they would surely have found therein Much discrepancy.”
“Say: "O men! I am sent unto you all, as the Messenger of Allah, to Whom belongeth the dominion of the heavens and the earth: there is no god but He: it is He That giveth both life and death. So believe in Allah and His Messenger, the Unlettered Prophet, who believeth in Allah and His words: follow him that (so) ye may be guided."”
Nine replies answered
Bhagavad Gita 9:20-22 — chapter 9, verses 20-22
“Those who know the three (branches of) knowledge, who drink the Soma juice, whose sins are washed away, offer sacrifices and pray to me for a passage into heaven; and reaching the holy world of the lord of gods, they enjoy in the celestial regions the celestial pleasures of the gods. And having enjoyed that great heavenly world, they enter the mortal world when (their) merit is exhausted. Thus those who wish for objects of desire, and resort to the ordinances of the three (Vedas), obtain (as the fruit) going and coming. To those men who worship me, meditating on me and on no one else, and who are constantly devoted, I give new gifts and preserve what is acquired by them.”
Cited for
Paradise is Svarga under another name. The Gita says people enjoy heaven, then "enter the mortal world when (their) merit is exhausted".
The response
The Gita gives its own reason: the merit is exhausted. That describes a heaven paid for like a wage. The Prophet (ﷺ) said no one's deeds will save him, not even his own, without God's (﷾) mercy. The Qur'an calls the Garden "a gift without break". Its people do not taste death there, and they are never asked to leave. A rule about spent merit cannot apply where no merit is being spent.
Where it lands — Svarga ends because merit runs out. Paradise is given by mercy, so that cause of ending is not there (11:108; 15:48; 44:56).
Mundaka Upanishad 1.2.12 — chapter 1, section 2, verse 12
“Let a Brâhmana, after he has examined all these worlds which are gained by works, acquire freedom from all desires. Nothing that is eternal (not made) can be gained by what is not eternal (made). Let him, in order to understand this, take fuel in his hand and approach a Guru who is learned and dwells entirely in Brahman.”
Cited for
"Nothing that is eternal (not made) can be gained by what is not eternal (made)." Your own book calls Paradise a reward, so a limited life cannot earn an endless one.
The response
The Qur'an does speak of reward, and deeds count. But no deed earns the Garden by its own worth. Al-Nawawi explains that deeds are the cause of entering, while the help to do them and their acceptance are God's (﷾) mercy. A good deed counts ten times over, an evil deed only as itself, and entry still comes by mercy. So the Mundaka's rule is true of a price, and Paradise has no price. Hindus who worship a personal Lord say the same of moksha. The Gita says the eternal seat comes "through my favour", and Ramanuja says the Lord frees those who please Him.
Where it lands — Limited deeds cannot buy the eternal. It can only be given, as Islam teaches of Paradise and the Gita of the eternal seat (6:160; 11:108; Gita 18:56).
Bhagavad Gita 8:15-16 — chapter 8, verses 15-16
“The high-souled ones, who achieve the highest perfection, attaining to me, do not again come to life, which is transient, a home of woes. All worlds, O Arguna! up to the world of Brahman, are (destined) to return. But, O son of Kuntî! after attaining to me, there is no birth again.”
Cited for
"All worlds", up to the world of Brahman, return. Every world is also destroyed at the great dissolution. Paradise is a world, so it must end.
The response
That rule comes from the Hindu picture of worlds that return. The Qur'an does speak of this world ending. But the people of the Garden enter it after that end, and it is promised to them for ever. So the rule cannot simply be applied to it. The Gita also has its own exception: "after attaining to me, there is no birth again". It speaks of what "is not destroyed when all entities are destroyed", and calls it "my supreme abode". So a lasting abode with the Lord is not an impossible idea in Hinduism. The Qur'an promises such a home, in the Presence of the Lord.
Where it lands — The Gita itself excepts nearness to the Lord from its rule, and the Garden is that nearness (Gita 8:16, 8:20-21; 54:54-55).
Qur'an 11:108 — Surat Hud (Hud), verse 108
“And those who are blessed shall be in the Garden: They will dwell therein for all the time that the heavens and the earth endure, except as thy Lord willeth: a gift without break.”
Cited for
Your own verse limits Paradise: "for all the time that the heavens and the earth endure, except as thy Lord willeth". And 28:88 says everything perishes except His Face.
The response
The verse ends "a gift without break". Ibn Kathir explains the exception: their staying is not necessary in itself, but rests on God's (﷾) will, so the favour is always His. The last words were added so that no one should imagine a break. Elsewhere the Qur'an says they "will dwell therein for ever". Ibn Kathir reads 28:88 as saying God (﷾) alone is the Everlasting, and creatures have no lasting of their own. Ramanuja says the same of the freed soul: its blessings are permanent only because the Lord is permanent. Nothing made lasts by itself. The Garden lasts by God's (﷾) promise.
Where it lands — The Garden does not last by its own nature. It lasts by God's (﷾) will, and He has declared it without break (11:108; 98:8).
Bhagavad Gita 2:42-44 — chapter 2, verses 42-44
“The state of mind consisting in firm understanding regarding steady contemplation does not belong to those, O son of Prithâ! who are strongly attached to (worldly) pleasures and power, and whose minds are drawn away by that flowery talk which is full of (ordinances of) specific acts for the attainment of (those) pleasures and (that) power, and which promises birth as the fruit of acts—(that flowery talk) which those unwise ones utter, who are enamoured of Vedic words, who say there is nothing else, who are full of desires, and whose goal is heaven.”
Cited for
Wanting Paradise is still desire. The Gita warns against those "who are full of desires, and whose goal is heaven".
The response
The verse speaks of people who worship for pleasures and power. It does not say every wish is wrong. The Chandogya says the Self desires "what it ought to desire". It says of "whatever object he desires" that "by his mere will it comes to him". The Brahma Sutra repeats it. The seeker of moksha also wants something: he wants release. The Qur'an praises those who feed the poor "for the love of Allah", wanting no reward from people. Its summit is His good pleasure. Wishing to meet the One who made you is a true desire.
Where it lands — The texts separate true desires from false ones, as the Qur'an does. The wish to meet the Lord is a true one (Chandogya 8.2.10; 9:72; 76:8-9).
Chandogya Upanishad 8.12.3 — chapter 8, section 12, verse 3
“Thus does that serene being, arising from this body, appear in its own form, as soon as it has approached the highest light (the knowledge of Self). He (in that state) is the highest person (uttama purusha). He moves about there laughing (or eating), playing, and rejoicing (in his mind), be it with women, carriages, or relatives, never minding that body into which he was born.”
Cited for
Paradise is a sensual prize, while moksha is purely spiritual. Lines about laughing and playing are only pictures.
The response
Paradise has real joys of the body, and none of them cloys or harms. They are not its summit: the Qur'an puts God's (﷾) good pleasure above the gardens and mansions. The Chandogya speaks of the freed one laughing, playing and rejoicing, and of food and drink by his mere will. Ramanuja takes this as said "Concerning the released soul". A Hindu may read these lines as pictures. But the shruti's own language shows that joy of this kind is not treated as shameful. What matters is whether the joy leads away from the Lord, and in Paradise it does not.
Where it lands — Joys of the body do not make a home low. The summit of Paradise is the Lord (Chandogya 8.12.3; 9:72; Muslim 181a).
Brihadaranyaka Upanishad 2.4.13 — chapter 2, section 4, verse 13
“Then Maitreyî said: 'Here thou hast bewildered me, Sir, when thou sayest that having departed, there is no more knowledge.' But Yâgñavalkya replied: 'O Maitreyî, I say nothing that is bewildering. This is enough, O beloved, for wisdom. 'For when there is as it were duality, then one sees the other, one smells the other, one hears the other, one salutes the other, one perceives the other, one knows the other; but when the Self only is all this, how should he smell another, how should he see another, how should he hear another, how should he salute another, how should he perceive another, how should he know another? How should he know Him by whom he knows all this? How, O beloved, should he know (himself), the Knower?'”
Cited for
Any joy with a second is still limited. Only when the Self is all is there nothing left to want or lose. And nothing is lost, because the Self is bliss itself.
The response
Maitreyi felt the problem and said she was bewildered. Indra said, "I see no good in this". Ramanuja says it does not help to answer that pure consciousness remains. No sensible person strives for what remains after he has perished. A bliss that no one is left to have is not what a seeker hopes for. And the claim depends on the soul being Brahman, which Ramanuja and Madhva reject. Being made is not a fault in a soul. A soul that is loved by its Maker, and that sees Him, is not lacking anything. The Qur'an speaks to those who believed in His Signs and submitted to Him. It says, "no fear shall be on you that Day, nor shall ye grieve".
Where it lands — A joy needs someone to have it. The Qur'an gives the soul its Lord and removes its fear (43:68-70; 89:27-30).
Bhagavad Gita 5:23-24 — chapter 5, verses 23-24
“He who even in this world, before his release from the body, is able to bear the agitations produced from desire and wrath, is a devoted man, he is a happy man. The devotee whose happiness is within (himself), whose recreation is within (himself), and whose light (of knowledge) also is within (himself), becoming (one with) the Brahman, obtains the Brahmic bliss.”
Cited for
Moksha can be tasted now. The Gita speaks of the man who "even in this world" has "happiness" within, and "obtains the Brahmic bliss". Paradise must wait until after death.
The response
The Qur'an also gives peace in this life. Hearts find satisfaction in the remembrance of Allah (﷾), and whoever does right with faith is given "a life that is good and pure". So the believer does not wait for death to begin. The difference is that the Qur'an also tells you what comes next, and whom you will meet.
Where it lands — Islam gives peace before death and a named meeting after it (13:28; 16:97; 89:27-30).
Sarva-Darsana-Samgraha, chapter 5 (The System of Purna-Prajna) — p. 98
“Knowing Vishṇu, full of all excellences, the soul, exempted from transmigration, Rejoices in his presence for ever, enjoying painless bliss. Vishṇu is the refuge of liberated souls, and their supreme ruler. Obedient to him are they for ever; he is the Lord.”
Cited for
To be a servant for ever is still bondage. Moksha is freedom.
The response
In the texts of Madhva's school the liberated are "Obedient to him" for ever, and they rejoice. Ramanuja says the permanence of the freed soul's blessings depends on the Lord. So for these schools a soul can depend on the Lord and be free. The bondage Hindus fear is the round of birth, pain and death. Paradise has none of it: no death, no toil and no grief. To serve the One who loves you, in a place with no fear, is not the chain moksha was meant to break.
Where it lands — Madhva's freed souls and the people of the Garden both serve for ever, and both rejoice (10:10; 35:34-35).
Perspectives
Advaita: the self is Brahman
Brahman alone is real, and the true self is Brahman. Moksha is knowing this. It is not produced by any deed, so it cannot end. In the final state there is no second to know or to enjoy, and every heaven is a lower thing.
Shankara and the Advaita Vedanta school
Release "differs from all the fruits of action" and is "an eternally and essentially disembodied state". So it cannot run out as a heaven does.
Rebuttal
That is Shankara's teaching, and it rests on the self being Brahman. Ramanuja and Madhva reject that. Paradise is not a fruit of action either: it is a gift of mercy, and it does not run out.
As rivers lose "their name and their form" in the sea, so he who knows Brahman "becomes even Brahman" (Mundaka 3.2.8-9).
Rebuttal
The same verse says the wise man "goes to the divine Person, who is greater than the great". So even this line speaks of going to a Person. The Qur'an says plainly that the soul comes back to its Lord.
Where there is duality one knows another. But when "the Self only is all this", "how should he know another?" (Brihadaranyaka 2.4.13). So any joy with a second is not final.
Rebuttal
Maitreyi herself said this bewildered her, and Indra saw "no good" in a Self that knows nothing. Ramanuja says no sensible person strives for what remains after he has perished. A joy needs someone to have it.
Nothing is lost in moksha, because the Self is bliss itself: "bliss is Brahman" (Taittiriya 3.6).
Rebuttal
Ramanuja answers this from inside Hinduism. To say that "pure consciousness" persists, he writes, "by no means improves your case". No one strives so that something may remain "after he himself has perished". The Qur'an promises a joy with someone left to have it: faces "Looking towards their Lord".
Vishishtadvaita: the soul enjoys the Lord
The freed soul stays a soul. The Lord, pleased by faithful worship, frees it from karma, gives it the direct sight of His nature, and never sends it back. It shares His joy, not His rule of the world.
Ramanuja and the Sri Vaishnava tradition
The Lord lets His devotees reach "that supreme bliss which consists in the direct intuition of His own true nature". Then He "does not turn them back".
Rebuttal
Islam agrees that the highest joy is the sight of the Lord and that He does not send His people away. The Qur'an promises this, and adds that the soul is not His body or part. Nothing whatever is like Him.
A man told that release means "the loss of personal existence" would turn away, so the "I" must remain in release.
Rebuttal
Islam agrees that the soul remains. But this argument also shows that such a moksha is not higher in kind than Paradise. It is a soul, for ever, in the joy of its Lord. What then decides is who the Lord is, and who has told the truth about Him.
Dvaita: for ever different
The soul and the Lord are different for ever. Release comes only by the grace of Vishnu. The freed soul rejoices in his presence and is obedient to him for ever, and the released stand in grades.
Madhva and his school
The freed soul "Rejoices in his presence for ever, enjoying painless bliss", and the liberated are obedient to Vishnu for ever.
Rebuttal
This has the same shape as the Qur'an's promise: servants in the Presence of their Lord, for ever. The dispute is over who the Lord is. The Qur'an says He has no equal, and that every being comes to Him as a servant.
The released are not equal, yet this breeds no jealousy, since all "are free from defects or shortcomings".
Rebuttal
The Qur'an too speaks of degrees, and says God (﷾) removes any lurking sense of injury from their hearts. So ranks cannot be what makes moksha higher than Paradise.
The texts on heaven
Heavens gained by good works end when the merit is used up. Every world up to the world of Brahman returns. The goal is to pass beyond them all.
The Upanishads and the Bhagavad Gita
Those who reach heaven "enter the mortal world when (their) merit is exhausted" (Gita 9:21). Paradise is such a heaven.
Rebuttal
The verse describes a heaven paid for with merit. Paradise is not paid for: no one's deeds save him without God's (﷾) mercy, and the Qur'an calls it "a gift without break".
"Nothing that is eternal (not made) can be gained by what is not eternal (made)" (Mundaka 1.2.12).
Rebuttal
Islam agrees that limited deeds cannot buy what has no end. That is why Paradise comes by mercy. The Gita also says the eternal seat comes "through my favour".
"All worlds", up to the world of Brahman, "are (destined) to return" (Gita 8:16).
Rebuttal
The same verse goes on: "after attaining to me, there is no birth again". So nearness to the Lord is the exception. In the Qur'an the Garden is in His Presence, and no one is asked to leave.
Devotion above release
For the devotee, release itself is not the highest thing. Devotees refuse every kind of release, even when offered, because they want to serve the Lord.
The Bhagavata Purana and devotional schools
Devotees do not accept any of the five kinds of release, even when it is offered, without serving the Lord (Bhagavata 3.29.13).
Rebuttal
Then a Hindu text itself puts loving service above moksha. Islam agrees that serving the Lord is no lesser end: even in Paradise the cry is "Glory to Thee, O Allah!". That service is owed to the One who has no partner.
The Islamic perspective
Hindu teachers give three different ends under one word. Paradise is not a heaven of merit that runs out. It is God's (﷾) gift, and it does not end. The soul stays a servant, its wishes are met, and its summit is God's (﷾) good pleasure and the sight of Him.
No one is saved by his deeds alone, but by God's (﷾) mercy, so Paradise is not a wage that runs out.
Paradise is "a gift without break". Its people do not taste death there, are never asked to leave, and wish for no change.
Shankara, Ramanuja and Madhva give three different accounts of moksha. These cannot all be true.
The Gita's rule that worlds return has its own exception: after reaching the Lord there is no birth again. Paradise is the Presence of the Lord.
The Chandogya says the freed soul's wishes are met by its mere will. So a home where wishes are met is not lower in kind.
The greatest bliss of Paradise is the good pleasure of Allah (﷾) and the sight of Him.
The soul stays a servant for ever, and it never becomes God.
The Qur'an asks to be considered with care, and Muhammad (ﷺ) was sent to all mankind.